Posted by David Bernstein:
Does the Financial Crisis Discredit Libertarianism:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2008_12_21-2008_12_27.shtml#1230074542


   In my view, what we are seeing today is the unwinding of multiple
   bubbles, starting with the stock market bubble in the late 90s, the
   housing bubble of the mid-2000s, and the most recent mini-bubble in
   commodities. These bubbles all have a common source, which was lax
   monetary policy coming out of central banks. These lax policies were
   meant to cushion the impact of multiple crises, starting with the
   crisis in 1998 that arose from the Russian default and the plunge in
   Asian markets through 9/11. Banking authorities, most notably Alan
   Greenspan, thought they had inflation under control because price
   inflation was under control (thanks, largely, to the huge boon to
   consumers of globalization; consider all the unbelievably cheap "made
   in China" products on the shelves), and came up with all sorts of
   rationalizations as to why ASSET price inflation was not really
   inflation. The incompetence of the relevant authorities in
   understanding asset inflation is demonstrated by the fact that
   Greenspan bought into the idea that housing prices wouldn't fall
   nationwide because they never had before--forgetting that the
   underlying increase in housing prices was itself unprecedented.
   Greenspan obviously believed, against all historical data, that the
   run up in prices was a natural result of market forces.

   In short, we can argue from here to eternity over exactly what
   pro-free market or pro-regulatory U.S. government policies
   precipitated the crisis as it actually developed. But if I'm right
   that the underlying problem was overly lax monetary policy, which sent
   false signals to the market regarding the true price/value of money
   and the amount of real wealth that was being created, it seems to me
   that even if financial sector/housing policy had been infinitely wise,
   the bubble would have developed in another sector where policy was
   less wise.

   Keep in mind also that putting aside all of the debate about what the
   Bush Administration, Congress, Clinton, et al., did or did not do, the
   housing bubble was not an American phenomenon, but was as bad or worse
   in various parts of Western Europe, Eastern Europe, and Asia, which,
   I'm guessing, have about as broad a range of regulatory policies
   regarding both housing and finance as one can reasonably expect. The
   prior stock market bubble was also a worldwide phenomenon, as was, of
   course, the commodities mini-bubble. This again suggests that the
   problem was a worldwide misapprehension by central bankers of the
   consequences of their actions, and not some specific pro or anti free
   market policies pursued by the U.S. government (not to say that wiser
   policies couldn't have helped mitigate the damage at some point,
   especially by cracking down on leverage when there was still time, one
   of the apparently forgotten lessons of the Great Depression...)

   As Eric Posner suggests below, the pure libertarian solution--a free
   market in money, with no central bank intervention--is not even on the
   table among "serious thinkers." And I'm not even going to argue that
   the pure libertarian solution is the right one. But if the blame is
   accurately placed primarily on central bank policy, then it's rather
   foolish to consider this a failure of libertarianism or free markets.

   It is, on the other hand, an example of the failure of a particular
   libertarian, Alan Greenspan. Somehow, perhaps for
   ideological/psychological reasons, he appears to have seen himself as
   a champion of an anti-regulatory ideology, even though he was the most
   powerful regulator in the world, and was artificially reducing the
   cost of money. It would be hard for even the best satirist to come up
   with a figure like Greenspan, an objectivist who wielded more
   government power over the economy than any other individual in the
   world, used that power incompetently, and then allowed himself to
   believe (at least twice) that bubbles that his policies helped create
   were the result of the "free market" and needed to be left alone.

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to