Posted by Eric Posner:
Happy Generic Holiday
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2008_12_21-2008_12_27.shtml#1230395044


   �Happy Holidays� [1]irritates Eugene. He says that the generic quality
   of the greeting gets under his skin; �Merry Christmas� is fine with
   him. But why should the generic quality of a greeting bother him? What
   could be more generic than �Hello�? But I bet that �Hello� does not
   bother Eugene.

   I suspect that what annoys Eugene is that the person who says �Happy
   Holidays� to him is afraid of offending him. The person knows or
   suspects that Eugene is Jewish and worries that �Merry Christmas�
   would offend a Jew. Odd to think that you can irritate a person by
   trying not to offend him! But the key here is the presumption that
   Eugene is religious and, more to the point, thin-skinned about his
   religion. The person who says �Happy Holidays� to Eugene reveals that
   he believes that Eugene is thin-skinned and priggish and presumes that
   Eugene is religious when Eugene in fact is a relaxed and good-natured
   fellow and not religious at all (or so I assume). No wonder Eugene is
   annoyed.

   The problem for the interlocutor who perhaps does not know Eugene well
   is that some people would be offended by �Merry Christmas.� That
   greeting also presumes a great deal�namely, that the addressee is
   Christian or relaxed about religion or thinks of Christmas as a
   secular holiday. When that presumption turns out to be wrong, offense
   occurs. There is no doubt that �Happy Holidays� is a lower risk
   greeting than �Merry Christmas. The flight to generality occurs when
   people know each other less well and thus know less about their
   religious views and overall temperament. All in all, �Happy Holidays�
   is less presumptuous than �Merry Christmas;� so why does it annoy
   Eugene?

   The answer is that more generic greetings (and other practices such as
   gift-giving) reflect social distance (as Eugene, says a way to "play
   it safe"); generic greetings should really only annoy when they are
   conveyed by people who are close to us. If a person who celebrates
   Christmas receives a greeting of �Happy Holidays� from his spouse or
   child or friends, the greeting would seem a bit chilly, and one would
   suspect that something is wrong. And if you celebrate and care about
   Christmas, a hearty �Merry Christmas� from a stranger sounds warmer
   than �Happy Holidays� because, it turns out, the stranger has
   something more in common with you than the stranger who says �Happy
   Holidays.� The stranger is engaging in a high-risk, high-return
   strategy; a generic �Happy Holidays� is less likely to offend a
   non-Christian even if it sounds chilly.

   Eugene might have had in mind someone who knew him well when
   complaining about �Happy Holidays,� perhaps a colleague or student.
   Otherwise, he�s being a bit hard on people. Or perhaps he is annoyed
   by the general tendency for people to adopt increasingly bland and,
   sometimes, euphemistic terms in order to avoid the risk of offense in
   all circumstances. The fear of giving offense�especially to ethnic and
   religious minorities, and people who do poorly for various reasons
   (uneducated, lower class, disabled, and so forth)�is ubiquitous in our
   society, but we should be used to it by now. Social distance is the
   price we pay for diversity. We avoid excluding some people by being
   remote to everyone.

References

   1. http://volokh.com/posts/1230062870.shtml

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to