Posted by Jonathan Adler:
Obama Administration Withdraws EPA Cert Request:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2009_02_08-2009_02_14.shtml#1234212012


   Last week, Acting Solicitor General Edwin Kneedler [1]filed a motion
   informing the Supreme Court that the federal government is no longer
   seeking review of [2]New Jersey v. EPA, in which the U.S. Court of
   Appeals for the D.C. Circuit invalidated the Bush Administration's
   controversial mercury rule that sought to create a cap-and-trade
   system for mercury emissions from coal-fired utilities. Instead,
   Kneedler informed the justices, the Obama Administration would develop
   new regulations in accord with the appeals court ruling.

   SCOTUSBlog [3]notes that this is a "fairly radical policy reversal for
   the EPA." That it is, but not because it changes the ultimate outcome.
   As I noted [4]here, the Bush EPA's mercury rule was quite flawed, and
   almost certainly illegal under the Clean Air Act. Thus even had the
   Court accepted cert in the case, a victory for EPA seemed quite
   unlikely, and the Obama Administration would have to develop new
   rules. The justices could still take the case, as an industry-backed
   cert petition is still pending for Friday's conference, but the odds
   this case will be accepted would seem to have dropped quite
   dramatically. So the primary effect of this decision is to accelerate
   the timetable for developing new mercury rules.

   Meanwhile, the Bush Administration finally scored a victory (albeit
   somewhat belatedly) in a lower profile Clean Air Act case, [5]South
   Coast Air Quality Management District v. EPA. On Friday, the D.C.
   Circuit rejected an environmentalist challenge to the EPA's failure to
   develop more stringent emission standards for large marine diesel
   engines in a more timely fashion. Given the number of times federal
   courts of appeals have [6]struck down Bush Administration air rules,
   this seems significant, even if the case is relatively minor. More on
   the decision [7]here.

References

   1. 
http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2009/02/sg-changes-stance-in-clean-air-act-case.html
   2. http://pacer.cadc.uscourts.gov/docs/common/opinions/200802/05-1097a.pdf
   3. 
http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/epa-moves-to-dismiss-clean-air-act-case-reversing-bush-administration-policies/
   4. http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2008_02_10-2008_02_16.shtml#1202877530
   5. http://pacer.cadc.uscourts.gov/common/opinions/200902/08-1030-1163599.pdf
   6. http://volokh.com/posts/chain_1219156411.shtml
   7. 
http://environmentallaw.wordpress.com/2009/02/06/delay-on-marine-engines-upheld/

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to