Posted by Jonathan Adler:
Do Judges Make Better Justices?
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2009_02_15-2009_02_21.shtml#1234840409


   In a recent speech, Chief Justice Roberts suggested that having more
   former appellate judges on the Supreme Court makes the Court's
   decisions less political. The NYT [1]reports:

     Over the life of the Supreme Court, its members were quite likely
     to be former governors, legislators, cabinet members, law
     professors and practicing lawyers. That mix of backgrounds and
     expertise might strike some as valuable, but the chief justice
     suggested that it tended to inject policy and politics into an area
     properly reserved for the law.

     As late as 1972, when Chief Justice Roberts�s predecessor, William
     H. Rehnquist, joined the court as an associate justice, former
     federal judges were in the minority.

     As a consequence, Chief Justice Roberts said, �the practice of
     constitutional law � how constitutional law was made � was more
     fluid and wide ranging than it is today, more in the realm of
     political science.�

     Since then, Chief Justice Roberts continued, �the method of
     analysis and argument shifted to the more solid grounds of legal
     arguments. What are the texts of the statutes involved? What
     precedents control?�

     That move, he said, has resulted in �a more legal perspective and
     less of a policy perspective.�

   I understand why the Chief Justice might think this way, but I am
   skeptical. There does not appear for there to be much empirical
   support for his claim, and reasons to believe that a Court made up
   exclusively of former appellate judges might have other deficiencies.

     If Chief Justice Roberts was implying that the court became less
     political as the number of former judges on it rose, said Lee
     Epstein, who teaches law and political science at Northwestern and
     is one of the authors of the study, �the data don�t support it.�

     And not everyone supports the idea that members of the court should
     have uniform backgrounds. The psychological literature demonstrates
     that �the more homogenous the group, the worse the quality of the
     decisions they make,� said Tracey E. George, a law professor at
     Vanderbilt and the author of a law review article about the
     consequences of promoting former judges to the Supreme Court.

   I am not eager to see a former politician on the High Court, but I
   believe it would be valuable to have justices with greater trial court
   and non-judicial experience.

References

   1. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/17/us/17bar.html

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to