Posted by Ilya Somin:
Federal District Judge Samuel B. Kent Pleads Guilty to Charges of Obstruction 
of Justice and Resigns from the Bench:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2009_02_22-2009_02_28.shtml#1235881994


   I missed this when it happened a few days ago. But it's worth noting
   that [1]Texas federal district Judge Samuel B. Kent pleaded guilty to
   charges of obstruction of justice last week, and is resigning from the
   bench as part of the plea deal:

     No means no � even if you are a federal judge with a lifetime
     appointment and a larger-than-life ego.

     That is but one lesson in the ugly and utterly avoidable case of
     United States of America v. Samuel B. Kent. On Monday, Kent, a U.S.
     district judge since 1990, pleaded guilty to lying to investigators
     about sexually abusing his secretary. In exchange, federal
     prosecutors dropped five sex-crime charges alleging he groped two
     women. Kent could have faced up to life in prison if convicted of
     all charges, but prosecutors say they will not seek more than three
     years in prison for Kent, who is 59...

     As part of his plea deal, Kent has agreed to retire immediately
     from the bench, likely avoiding impeachment by Congress, the
     constitutionally prescribed method for unseating a federal judge.

   Eugene Volokh and I discussed the Kent case in [2]a series of posts in
   2007 and 2008. At the time, I took a certain amount of flak for
   [3]urging that Congress investigate the possibility of of impeaching
   Kent. Kent's forced resignation makes the impeachment issue moot, of
   course. But it does suggest that there was good reason to consider the
   possibility until Kent finally agreed to resign on his own. As I
   pointed out in [4]my first post on the subject, the sexual harrassment
   that caused Kent's downfall was the latest in a long series of
   ethically dubious actions by the judge. The federal judiciary will be
   the better for his absence.

References

   1. http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/editorial/6277300.html
   2. http://volokh.com/posts/chain_1219983137.shtml
   3. http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2007_09_30-2007_10_06.shtml#1191044678
   4. http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2007_09_30-2007_10_06.shtml#1191044678

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to