Posted by Jonathan Adler:
Bring Back the Filibuster, For Real:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2009_03_01-2009_03_07.shtml#1236016620


   Professor [1]David RePass thinks we have too many "phantom
   filibusters." As a consequence, there is a de facto sixty-vote
   requirement for passing legislation in the Senate. While I disagree
   with Professor RePass' claim that the "phantom filibuster" is
   "unconstitutional" -- the Senate clearly has the authority to set its
   own internal rules -- I do think that "real" filibusters, in which the
   minority has to take the floor to prolong debate and stave off a vote,
   are preferable to the current practice. So where was Prof. RePass when
   "phantom filibusters" were used against President Bush's judicial
   nominees?

References

   1. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/02/opinion/02RePass.html

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to