Posted by Jonathan Adler:
Obama Suspends Bush ESA Rule:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2009_03_01-2009_03_07.shtml#1236179778


   Among the Bush Administration's more controversial, last-minute
   regulatory changes was a rule to relax the consultation requirement
   under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act. Specifically, the rule
   allowed federal agencies the latitude to make their own initial
   determination as to whether they had to engage in consultation with
   the Fish and Wildlife Service or National Marine Fisheries Service
   over the potential adverse impacts on endangered or threatened species
   of activities funded, permitted, or undertaken by the federal
   government. In a [1]presidential memorandum issued yesterday,
   President Obama called upon Interior and Commerce Departments (homes
   to the Fish & Wildlife Service and National Marine Fisheries Service,
   respectively) to reconsider the rule. Perhaps more significantly, the
   President also instructed all agency heads to "exercise their
   discretion, under the new regulation, to follow the prior longstanding
   consultation and concurrence practices involving the FWS and NMFS." In
   other words, federal agencies are to act as if the Bush Administration
   rule were never adopted, until such time the Obama Administration is
   able to put in place a new rule of its own.

   Reactions to the memo are largely what one would expect.
   Environmentalists cheered, while industry warned of greater costs and
   permitting delays. [2]From the Washington Post:

     Francesca Grifo of the Union of Concerned Scientists, an activist
     group, said the switch would help guard against the potential
     conflicts of interest and lack of expertise that could color
     decision making by any agency hoping to press ahead with a
     particular project. "After years of scientific scandal, the
     Interior Department and its partner agencies need desperately to
     regain credibility by making decisions with honesty, clarity, and
     transparency," Grifo said.

     But Bill Kovacs, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce's vice president of
     environment, technology and regulatory affairs, said reviving
     another layer of review "will result in even greater delays to
     projects -- including stimulus-backed, job-creating projects -- as
     agencies now grapple with the prospect of lengthy inter-agency
     consultations to determine, for instance, if a bridge project in
     Florida contributes to the melting of Arctic ice. This is such a
     departure from the spirit and the letter of the Endangered Species
     Act that we wonder if the law's drafters would even recognize it
     today."

   A big question is how this rule will effect agency consultation
   obligations for actions that result in increased greenhouse gas
   emissions. Now that the [3]polar bear is listed as a threatened
   species, some environmental groups argue that large projects permitted
   or funded by the federal government should be subject to Section 7
   consultation due to their potential contribution to climate change and
   the consequent effect on polar bears. The Obama Administration,
   however, appears to be taking a slightly different view.

     Administration officials said the move is not likely to trigger
     broad use of the Endangered Species Act to regulate greenhouse gas
     emissions. While the Bush rule specifically prohibited endangered
     species consultations on the basis of "global processes" such as
     climate change, an Interior official who asked not to be identified
     said under the new policy such a review would only be triggered if
     scientific evidence suggested "a causal connection" between
     emissions from a federal project and its effect on specific
     imperiled species or an identifiable part of its habitat.

References

   1. 
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/Memorandum-for-the-Heads-of-Executive-Departments-and-Agencies/
   2. 
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/03/AR2009030302620.html?hpid=topnews
   3. http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2008_08_24-2008_08_30.shtml#1220068021

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to