Posted by Eugene Volokh:
Home Schooling and Child Custody:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2009_03_08-2009_03_14.shtml#1236961987


   [1]The News & Observer (North Carolina) reports:

     Wake District Court Judge Ned Mangum said on Friday that he will
     require Venessa Mills to enroll her children in a public school for
     the upcoming school year. The ruling came as part of an ongoing
     divorce case....

     Thomas Mills, Venessa's husband, had raised concerns that the
     children would be sheltered in a home school instead of in a
     regular public school setting.

     Mangum appeared to agree with Thomas Mills at last week's court
     hearing even as the judge said that home-schooling has "had a great
     benefit" for the children.

     "I do think that in the interests of the children being well
     rounded that public school will be a great option for them," Mangum
     said during the court hearing. [Audio of that is available on the
     News & Observer site. -EV] ...

     The Mills' three children, ages 12, 11 and 10, have been
     home-schooled by their mother since 2005. She said they have made
     noticeable academic improvement since then, with two of the
     children performing two grade levels above their ages.

   [2]WRAL (Raleigh) also reports:

     In an affidavit filed Friday in the divorce case, ... Thomas Mills
     ... said he was "concerned about the children's religious-based
     science curriculum" and that he wants "the children to be exposed
     to mainstream science, even if they eventually choose to believe
     creationism over evolution." ...

     In a verbal ruling, Mangum said the children should go to public
     school.

     "He was upfront and said that, 'It's not about religion.' But yet
     when it came down to his ruling and reasons why, 'He said this
     would be a good opportunity for the children to be tested in the
     beliefs that I have taught them,'" Venessa Mills said....

   Of course -- if the judge's oral statements are being accurately
   reported by Venessa Mills -- the same logic would apply to children
   who are taught at private schools that teach creationism: If one
   divorced parent objects to such teaching, the judge could order that
   the children be sent to noncreationist schools instead of creationist
   schools, or give custody to that parent who promises to send the
   children to such schools.

   I should note that I would firmly oppose any judicial order
   interfering with the father's ability to expose the children to
   evolution when the children are visiting with him (assuming the mother
   is given custody and the father is given visitation). And I personally
   do think that it's more in a child's best interests to be taught
   evolution than to be taught creationism. I just don't think that the
   First Amendment allows judges to make decisions based on such matters,
   for reasons I mention in my [3]Parent-Child Speech and Child Custody
   Speech Restrictions article.

   For an earlier case suggesting -- in my view, wrongly -- that
   disfavoring the creationism-teaching parent is more legitimate in
   child custody cases, see Waites v. Waites, 567 S.W.2d 326, 333 (Mo.
   1978) (suggesting that under �best interests� test court may consider
   whether parent �would refuse to permit the child to attend a school
   class where evolution is taught�). For lots of cases in which judges
   considered parents' religiosity, atheism, racism, Communism, pacifism,
   support for Nazism, advocacy of the propriety of homosexuality,
   condemnation of homosexuality, and more, see the [4]article I cited
   above.

   For more on child custody decisions and home schooling -- setting
   aside the creationism issue, which as I note could arise even when the
   child is taught in a religious school outside the home -- see [5]these
   older posts.

   Thanks to Patrick Martin and Robert Bell for the pointers.

References

   1. http://www.newsobserver.com/news/story/1439689.html
   2. http://www.wral.com/news/local/story/4727161/
   3. http://www.law.ucla.edu/volokh/family.pdf
   4. http://www.law.ucla.edu/volokh/family.pdf
   5. http://volokh.com/posts/chain_1224892991.shtml

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to