Posted by Paul Cassell:
Was Israel's Gaza Campaign Proper Under the Law of Armed Conflict?
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2009_03_22-2009_03_28.shtml#1237830662


   Professor David Luban of Georgetown and my colleague Amos Guiora have
   this [1]interesting exchange about Israel's recent incursion into the
   Gaza strip.

   Luban argues that the Gaza campaign violated both the jus ad bellum
   and jus in bello proportionality principles and that the Hamas civil
   administration were not lawful targets under Israel's own
   interpretation of the law of armed conflict. Prof. Guiora argues that
   terrorism changes the landscape of armed conflict and requires a
   reconfiguration of international law. Under this reconfiguration, an
   entire terrorist organization may properly be targeted.

   Prof. Luban's article is entitled "Was the Gaza Campaign Legal;" Prof.
   Guiora's is entitled "Proportionality 'Re-Configured.'" Interesting
   reading.

References

   1. 
http://www.natseclaw.com/natseclaw/2009/03/an-exchange-on-israels-gaza-campaign.html

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to