Posted by Eugene Volokh:
Legal Term That's Most Uncommon in Ordinary Language:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2009_04_12-2009_04_18.shtml#1239654782


   My favorite is still [1]defamacast, with only 289 Google hits reported
   (though the reported number becomes only 60 if one actually pages
   through the results). The term isn't that common in law, either --
   it's just a Georgia term -- but what I like about it is that it
   purports to be just a normal English word, albeit one coined by
   Georgia courts. It's not some Latin phrase, or all-caps statutory
   abbreviation or agency identifiers, or some such. It looks like a
   word, but a highly uncommon one.

   I just came across another such example, which might be even more
   interesting, since I'm not sure that it's a self-conscious coinage
   (the way "defamacast" surely was): "Graffitism," defined in the
   [2]Columbus (Ohio) City Code as basically the act of writing graffiti.
   It's at 1020 Google hits reported, though the number becomes only 189
   if one actually pages through the results; and, as with "defamacast,"
   many of the results aren't even substantive uses of the term.

   Any other examples? Again, they have to be terms that are used as
   ordinary English words would be -- not Latin, not proper nouns, not
   all-caps, or the like. And, to give a convenient if arbitrary cutoff,
   they shouldn't yield more than 10,000 Google hits initially reported.
   (Just by way of a benchmark, "[3]burglariously" yields over 30,000
   Google hits initially reported.)

References

   1. http://volokh.com/posts/1217370587.shtml
   2. 
http://municipalcodes.lexisnexis.com/cgi-bin/hilite.pl/codes/columbus/_DATA/TITLE23/Chapter_2309_OFFENSES_INVOLVIN.html
   3. http://volokh.com/posts/1185993993.shtml

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to