Posted by Randy Barnett:
The Value of Petitioning for and Article V Amendments Conventions:  
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2009_05_03-2009_05_09.shtml#1241614060


   A new paper by Indiana law professor Gerard N. Magliocca, who blogs
   over at [1]Concurring Opinions, contends that Article V petitions for
   a convention to propose constitutional amendments is a useful means to
   achieve reform by affecting the behavior of Congress and the courts.
   You can download it from SSRN [2]here. It is entitled, [3]State Calls
   for an Article Five Convention: Mobilization and Interpretation. Here
   is the syllabus:

     This Essay argues that those seeking constitutional change ought to
     take a closer look at using the Article Five procedure by which
     state legislatures can petition Congress for a new constitutional
     convention. While the chances that such a conclave will occur are
     slim and none, the process for calling together such a body is a
     useful tool for getting voters to the polls and influencing the
     Supreme Court. After looking at some historical examples, the Essay
     points out that both parties are using state ballot initiatives to
     increase turnout at election time and that doing the same with
     Article Five petitions would increase the quality and quantity of
     citizen participation. Furthermore, a series of such petitions
     would constitute persuasive authority of contemporary
     constitutional values no different from the state legislation that
     the Justices look to in cases under the Eighth Amendment and the
     Due Process Clause.

   Here is the structure of the paper:

     Part I reviews prior attempts to use the Article Five petition
     procedure and shows that, when enough state legislatures join the
     cause, Congress almost always provides a remedy to halt the march
     to a convention. Part II looks at how putting federal
     constitutional issues before the voters in state elections can
     increase the quality and quantity of citizen participation. Part
     III explains why a critical mass of state petitions should be taken
     into account by courts when they are faced with related
     constitutional issues.

References

   1. 
http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/05/article-five-petitions.html
   2. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1284371
   3. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1284371

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to