Posted by Orin Kerr:
Justice Ginsburg Speaks to Press About Pending Cases, Urges Nomination of More  
Women to Supreme Court:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2009_05_03-2009_05_09.shtml#1241632506


   Justice Ginsburg recently [1]sat down with Joan Biskupic of the USA
   Today to discuss the importance of the Supreme Court having more
   women, and how the fact that she is the only women impacted the oral
   arguments and confidential discussions among the Justices about some
   still-undecided cases:

       Her status as the court's lone woman was especially poignant
     during a recent case involving a 13-year-old girl who had been
     strip-searched by Arizona school officials looking for drugs.
     During oral arguments, some other justices minimized the girl's
     lasting humiliation, but Ginsburg stood out in her concern for the
     teenager.
       "They have never been a 13-year-old girl," she told USA TODAY
     later when asked about her colleagues' comments during the
     arguments. "It's a very sensitive age for a girl. I didn't think
     that my colleagues, some of them, quite understood."
       . . . In interviews with USA TODAY before Souter's retirement
     announcement Friday, Ginsburg said the court needs another woman.
     "Women belong in all places where decisions are being made. I don't
     say (the split) should be 50-50," Ginsburg said. "It could be 60%
     men, 40% women, or the other way around. It shouldn't be that women
     are the exception."
       Since O'Connor's departure in 2006, oral arguments and the
     justices' behind-the-scenes discussions on how disputes should be
     resolved have had a different tone. In the strip-search case and
     others this term, Ginsburg has revealed a woman's point of view
     that was strikingly at odds with those of many of her colleagues.
       Ginsburg dominated oral arguments in an important case involving
     alleged discrimination related to pregnancy leaves. She was openly
     frustrated that some of her male colleagues, in her view, might not
     have understood the discrimination women face on the job.
       She said the arguments in that dispute echoed those of a 2007
     case involving Lilly Ledbetter, a 19-year worker at a Goodyear tire
     factory in Alabama who alleged that her pay didn't keep pace with
     that of men who had equal or less seniority. In that case, the
     court � with Ginsburg vigorously dissenting � narrowly ruled that
     women could not sue for pay inequities resulting from sex
     discrimination that had occurred years earlier.
       Oral arguments in the pregnancy case were "for me, Ledbetter
     repeated," Ginsburg told USA TODAY, adding that her colleagues
     showed "a certain lack of understanding" of the bias a woman can
     face on the job.

       Surprisingly, Justice Ginsburg did not share any circulated draft
   opinions in the cases, but then it may be that none were yet
   circulated.

References

   1. http://www.usatoday.com/printedition/news/20090506/1aginsburg06_cv.art.htm

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to