Posted by Jonathan Adler:
Abandoning the Clinton Legacy:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2009_05_10-2009_05_16.shtml#1242140942


   [1]Bill McGurn's column today suggests that the Obama Administration
   has done more to repudiate the legacy of President Clinton than that
   of President Bush. He writes:

     there's a persuasive case that the legacy most threatened by the
     Obama presidency belongs to the last Democrat who sat in the Oval
     Office: Bill Clinton.

     Think about it. It was Mr. Clinton who campaigned on the promise to
     "end welfare as we know it." It was Mr. Clinton who signed the bill
     removing the Glass-Steagall barriers separating commercial from
     investment banking. Most famously, it was Mr. Clinton who assured
     us that "the era of Big Government is over."

     Today all the assumptions that once defined Bill Clinton's "New
     Democrats" are being contested by the Obama White House. And
     nowhere is the contrast more stark than on the defining issue of
     trade.

   I think (hope?) it's too early to judge the Obama Administration's
   trade policy, but the point still stands. At the same time, the Obama
   Administration has made only modest, often just cosmetic, changes to
   the Bush Administration's counter-terror policies and is continuing
   the Bush Administration's fiscal profligacy. Is this a fair
   assessment?

References

   1. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124208471345908641.html

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to