Posted by David Kopel:
Preemption laws and leases of public property:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2009_05_10-2009_05_16.shtml#1242195382


   Here's a legal question that combines some of the favorite topics at
   the VC. David Nelson is the head of [1]Stonewall Shooting Sports, the
   pro-gun gay rights group in Utah. At the upcoming [2]Utah Pride
   Festival, Nelson wishes to carry a firearm lawfully, as Utah law
   authorizes him to do. However, the festival operators (a private
   organization) have a rule against carrying firearms at the festival.
   The festival takes place on public property, which is leased by the
   festival operators. The Salt Lake City police provide security for the
   Utah Pride event, and enforce the organization's rules, including the
   gun ban.
   Utah's firearms preemption law states:

     63-98-102. Uniform firearm laws.
     (1) The individual right to keep and bear arms being a
     constitutionally protected right under Article I, Section 6 of the
     Utah Constitution, the Legislature finds the need to provide
     uniform civil and criminal firearm laws throughout the state.
     (2) Except as specifically provided by state law, a local authority
     or state entity may not:
     (a) prohibit an individual from owning, possessing, purchasing,
     selling, transferring, transporting, or keeping a firearm at the
     individual's place of residence, property, business, or in any
     vehicle lawfully in the individual's possession or lawfully under
     the individual's control; or
     (b) require an individual to have a permit or license to purchase,
     own, possess, transport, or keep a firearm.
     (3) In conjunction with Title 76, Chapter 10, Part 5, Weapons, this
     section is uniformly applicable throughout this state and in all
     its political subdivisions and municipalities.
     (4) All authority to regulate firearms is reserved to the state
     except where the Legislature specifically delegates responsibility
     to local authorities or state entities.
     (5) Unless specifically authorized by the Legislature by statute, a
     local authority or state entity may not enact, establish, or
     enforce any ordinance, regulation, rule, or policy pertaining to
     firearms that in any way inhibits or restricts the possession or
     use of firearms on either public or private property.
     (6) As used in this section:
     (a) "firearm" has the same meaning as defined in Subsection
     76-10-501(9); and
     (b) "local authority or state entity" includes public school
     districts, public schools, and state institutions of higher
     education.
     (7) Nothing in this section restricts or expands private property
     rights.

   Utal has another preemption law. It says:

     76-10-500. Uniform law.
     (1) The individual right to keep and bear arms being a
     constitutionally protected right, the Legislature finds the need to
     provide uniform laws throughout the state. Except as specifically
     provided by state law, a citizen of the United States or a lawfully
     admitted alien shall not be:
     (a) prohibited from owning, possessing, purchasing, selling,
     transferring, transporting, or keeping any firearm at his place of
     residence, property, business, or in any vehicle lawfully in his
     possession or lawfully under his control; or
     (b) required to have a permit or license to purchase, own, possess,
     transport, or keep a firearm.
     (2) This part is uniformly applicable throughout this state and in
     all its political subdivisions and municipalities. All authority to
     regulate firearms shall be reserved to the state except where the
     Legislature specifically delegates responsibility to local
     authorities or state entities. Unless specifically authorized by
     the Legislature by statute, a local authority or state entity may
     not enact or enforce any ordinance, regulation, or rule pertaining
     to firearms.

   Nelson argues, inter alia, that subsections (4) and (5) of the first
   statute leave Salt Lake City without any authority to restrict the
   carrying of firearms, yet Salt Lake City, by leasing public property
   to a private organization which bans guns, and by using local police
   to enforce that ban, is doing so.
   Does Nelson have a valid legal argument? Does (7) save the Utah
   Pride's ban? Answers which supply specific legal authority will
   receive the highest grades.

References

   1. http://www.stonewallshootingsportsutah.org/
   2. http://www.utahpridecenter.org/utahpride/do-pride

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to