Posted by Ilya Somin:
Gary Kasparov on President Medvedev and the Future of Russia:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2009_05_10-2009_05_16.shtml#1242248306


   In recent months, there have been [1]a few indications that Russian
   President Dmitri Medvedev might break with Prime Minister Vladimir
   Putin - the authoritarian leader who handpicked him for his current
   position - and liberalize the country's economic and political system.
   In [2]today's Wall Street Journal, however, Russian opposition leader
   Gary Kasparov, the former world chess champion, writes that a
   Putin-Medvedev breakup may be less likely than many Westerners hope:

     It has become fashionable to speak of change and liberalization in
     Russia under President Dmitry Medvedev. May 7 marked his one-year
     anniversary in office. He has recently granted an interview with an
     opposition newspaper, allowed a few human-rights activists to
     criticize Russia's regime, and even started a blog. There is also a
     new administration in Washington that wants a fresh start with
     foreign powers.

     However, Mr. Medvedev's gestures have not been matched by policy.
     It is more appropriate to think of Russia as living under Vladimir
     Putin's ninth year in power. Mr. Putin is now prime minister but
     still in charge. His agenda of oppression and plunder is still the
     course in Russia. The Kremlin's willingness to install its
     candidates in office [without free election] and persecute its
     opponents remains undiminished.

   If Medvedev does make a decisive break with Putin, Kasparov believes
   it will likely be because of political pressures created by the global
   recession rather than because Medvedev genuinely wants liberalization:

     There are optimistic rumors in the West of a potential rift between
     Messrs. Medvedev and Putin. With the steep drop in energy prices,
     the Russian economy in free fall, and the need to find a scapegoat,
     a clash is likely. But it will not be because the two men differ
     significantly in matters of morality and power. We have seen enough
     to recognize that they are both enemies of democracy, open
     competition, and free expression.

   That seems roughly accurate to me.

References

   1. http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2009_02_08-2009_02_14.shtml#1234474059
   2. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124217260273613005.html

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to