Posted by David Kopel:
The No on Koh Letter:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2009_05_17-2009_05_23.shtml#1242846839


   In April, I signed a [1]joint letter to the Senate Foreign Relations
   Committee, raising concerns about the nomination Yale Law School Dean
   Harold Koh to be Legal Advisor to the U.S. Department of State. The No
   Koh website contains a [2]detailed report on Koh, written by Ed Whelan
   of the Ethics & Public Policy Center. The website also contains
   videos, a blog, and a FAQ, although these are aimed more at a lay
   audience than at persons engaged with legal policy.
   While I agree with most, although not necessarily all, of the points
   made on the No Koh website, my own view on Koh is based on reading six
   of his law review articles: [3]A World Drowning in Guns, 71 Fordham
   Law Review 2333 (2003); Is International Law Really State Law? 111
   Harvard Law Review 1824 (1998); [4]On American Exceptionalism, 55
   Stanford Law Review 1479 (2003); The 1998 Frankel Lecture: Bringing
   International Law Home, 35 Houston Law Review 623 (1998);
   International Law as Part of Our Law, 98 American Journal of
   International Law 43 (2004); Why Transnational Law Matters, 24 Penn
   State International Law Review 745 (2006).
   Deah Koh is an excellent writer and an impressive scholar. But his
   legal vision is for a substantial diminution of the sovereignty of the
   American people, and as Legal Advisor to the State Department, he
   would have tremendous power to advance that vision. As Dean Koh has
   explained, his writings on transnationalism are not merely
   descriptive; they are also a strategy for activists. Of course Dean
   Koh has the right to advocate as sees fit. The Constitution, however,
   requires that major presidential appointees must earn the Advice and
   Consent of the United States Senate. The Senate's duty to be
   especially careful on Advice and Consent would seem to be at its apex
   when an appointee's record shows a long-standing determination to
   weaken the existing constitutional sovereignty of the United States of
   America.

References

   1. http://preservesovereignty.wordpress.com/koh_letter/
   2. http://preservesovereignty.wordpress.com/koh_letter/
   3. http://law.fordham.edu/publications/articles/500flspub11111.pdf
   4. http://web.pdx.edu/~kinsella/ps448/koh.html

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to