Posted by Todd Zywicki:
The First Hispanic Justice:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2009_05_24-2009_05_30.shtml#1243390634


   Is there any evidence that choosing a Supreme Court nominee from a
   certain sex or race has any political impact? [1]Jan Crawford
   Greenburg writes today, for instance:

     President Obama had been �very interested� in her from the start,
     said one top adviser, and almost immediately, his political
     advisers--led by Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel--urged him to make
     history by tapping the first Hispanic justice.

     The selection of Sotomayor, they argued, would energize a key and
     growing constituency, which could well be disappointed in coming
     months by expected failures to get meaningful immigration reform.

   Is there any evidence that Ronald Reagan gained any real electoral
   benefit by appointing Sandra Day O'Connor? Or what about all the black
   votes that George H.W. Bush picked up by appointing Clarence Thomas?
   The Italians for the appointment of the first Italian Justice, Antonin
   Scalia? Did the Republicans really lose political support because
   George W. Bush appointed two white males instead of appointing a woman
   to replace O'Connor?

   I have to say, I just don't see it. Is there really a group of people
   out there who simultaneously (1) are well-enough informed and educated
   to follow the Supreme Court carefully and (2) would be impressed by
   the "diversity" of the candidate, as opposed to their judicial
   philosophy, ideology, or voting pattern on the Court? If so, who are
   these people?

   Recall the effort by the Republican Party to rally Hispanics in
   outrage over the [2]filibuster of Miguel Estrada:

     Mr. Bendixen's poll found that 28 percent of Hispanics support the
     nomination, while 11 percent opposed it and 61 percent weren't
     aware of the nomination or didn't have an opinion.

     He said that, based on listening to some of the poll interviews, it
     was clear many of those who supported Mr. Estrada were also
     confusing him with actor Erik Estrada, who was on the 1977-1983
     television police drama "CHiPS" and is now a popular
     Spanish-language soap-opera star.

     "Many of them think President Bush nominated Erik Estrada � I'd say
     a good third think that way," Mr. Bendixen said, adding that he
     heard one person say Mr. Estrada should be confirmed because he did
     such a good job playing a policeman on "CHiPS."

     Republicans' own numbers confirm that most Hispanics aren't aware
     of the situation. A poll released last week of 800 Hispanics, taken
     by Alexandria-based Latino Opinions and not limited to registered
     voters, showed that just one-third were aware the Estrada
     nomination is pending and being blocked.

   I recognize that the Supreme Court is higher-profile than the DC
   Circuit. But 2006 was probably the most high-profile year for the
   Supreme Court in recent memory, perhaps in history. Two appointments
   and the highly controversial nomination of Harriet Miers. Even then,
   [3]a poll found that 57 percent of Americans could not name a single
   Supreme Court Justice. The poll also found:

     The percentage of Americans who can name all nine current Supreme
     Court justices, statistically speaking, is zero. The percentage of
     Americans who can name eight or more of the nine current Supreme
     Court justices also statistically rounds to zero. Incorrect
     responses from those surveyed as to who is currently serving on the
     U.S. Supreme Court included George W. Bush, Hillary Clinton,
     Thurgood Marshall and Arnold Schwarzenegger.

   And that I'm not the professional politician here. But these positions
   like Supreme Court and cabinet officials are really pretty obscure to
   most Americans. And those voters who can actually name these people
   largely seem to think it irrelevant to how they vote. So while the
   conventional wisdom is that there is a savvy political calculus here,
   I just don't see it.

References

   1. http://blogs.abcnews.com/legalities/2009/05/becoming-nomine.html
   2. http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2005_07_03-2005_07_09.shtml#1120754525
   3. http://company.findlaw.com/pr/2006/011006.supremes.html

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to