Posted by Jonathan Adler:
More Rights at Gitmo, Fewer Elsewhere?
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2009_05_31-2009_06_06.shtml#1243821936


   [1]Jack Goldsmith observes that the expansion of legal rights for
   Guantanamo detainees and restrictions on rendition have been offset by
   other measures designed to compensate for the costs of the new
   limitations.

     A little-noticed consequence of elevating standards at Guantanamo
     is that the government has sent very few terrorist suspects there
     in recent years. Instead, it holds more terrorists -- without
     charge or trial, without habeas rights, and with less public
     scrutiny -- at Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan. Or it renders them
     to countries where interrogation and incarceration standards are
     often even lower. The cat-and-mouse game does not end there. As
     detentions at Bagram and traditional renditions have come under
     increasing legal and political scrutiny, the Bush and Obama
     administrations have relied more on other tactics. They have
     secured foreign intelligence services to do all the work --
     capture, incarceration and interrogation -- for all but the
     highest-level detainees. And they have increasingly employed
     targeted killings, a tactic that eliminates the need to interrogate
     or incarcerate terrorists but at the cost of killing or maiming
     suspected terrorists and innocent civilians alike without notice or
     due process.

   As Goldmsith notes, this shift may have negative consequences for both
   intelligence gathering and human rights � but it has PR benefits. As
   Goldsmith concludes:

     After nearly eight years without a follow-up attack, the public (or
     at least an influential sliver) is growing doubtful about the
     threat of terrorism and skeptical about using the lower-than-normal
     standards of wartime justice. The government, however, sees the
     terrorist threat every day and is under enormous pressure to keep
     the country safe. When one of its approaches to terrorist
     incapacitation becomes too costly legally or politically, it shifts
     to others that raise fewer legal and political problems. This
     doesn't increase our safety or help the terrorists. But it does
     make us feel better about ourselves.

References

   1. 
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/05/29/AR2009052902989.html?hpid=opinionsbox1

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to