Posted by Eugene Volokh:
*L.A. Times* Coverage of Second Amendment Incorporation Decisions:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2009_05_31-2009_06_06.shtml#1244058899


   The Seventh Circuit decision (from Chicago), holding that the Second
   Amendment doesn't apply to the states, is covered in a nearly-800-word
   story [1]today. The Ninth Circuit decision (from Northern California)
   this April, holding that the Second Amendment does apply to the
   states, wasn't covered at all.

   To be sure, there are possible explanations: Today's story was by the
   Times' Supreme Court reporter, and this case is more likely than the
   Ninth Circuit case to go to the Supreme Court, for reasons I described
   [2]here. The underlying controversy in the Seventh Circuit (a handgun
   ban) is more likely to interest people than the underlying controversy
   in the Ninth Circuit (a ban on gun possession on county property). And
   it's made higher profile by the controversy about Judge Sotomayor's
   participation in the Second Circuit's no-incorporation decision.

   At the same time, the broad legal issue -- whether state and local
   governments are bound by the federal right to bear arms -- is the
   same. The Ninth Circuit decision was the one that created the circuit
   split, and it did tee things up for the Court to consider the Second
   Circuit's incorporation case (again, discussed [3]here) -- perhaps not
   perfectly, but still in a way that strikes me as newsworthy. The Ninth
   Circuit decision is the one that suggests some gun laws may be
   unconstitutional, which seems to me a pretty newsworthy matter. And
   the Ninth Circuit case was more local than the Seventh Circuit case.

   So it seems to me that both cases would have been newsworthy to the
   L.A. Times, the Ninth Circuit case at least as much as the Seventh
   Circuit case. But as I noted [4]shortly after the Ninth Circuit
   decision, the Ninth Circuit case wasn't covered in the L.A. Times at
   the time.

   Likewise, the [5]Washington Post mentions the Seventh Circuit case
   (though in a heavily Sotomayor-focused article) and [6]didn't mention
   the Ninth Circuit case when that came down.

References

   1. 
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-gun-rights3-2009jun03,0,1976638.story
   2. http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2009_04_19-2009_04_25.shtml#1240254351
   3. http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2009_04_19-2009_04_25.shtml#1240254351
   4. http://volokh.com/posts/1241068762.shtml
   5. 
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/02/AR2009060203379.html?sub=AR
   6. http://volokh.com/posts/1241068762.shtml

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to