Posted by Jonathan Adler:
Sotomayor's Multiple "Wise Woman" Speeches:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2009_05_31-2009_06_06.shtml#1244301947


   This week it was [1]reported that Judge Sotomayor has made several
   speeches in which she suggested that a "wise Latina woman," or simply
   a "wise woman," would make different or better decisions as a judge
   than a "wise man." Does this matter? According to some, this is
   further evidence that her statement in a [2]2001 speech that she hoped
   a "wise Latina" judge would make "better" decisions than a white male
   judge was not an isolated misstatement or [3]"unscripted" moment, as
   claimed by the White House.

   Sotomayor's [4]supporters claim, however, that these prior speeches
   show that her 2001 speech was no big deal, as Republicans did not make
   these remarks an issue when she was nominated to the U.S. Court of
   Appeals for the Second Circuit. I am not sure I follow the logic of
   this argument, however, as it seems quite apparent that most Senators
   apply greater scrutiny to Supreme Court nominations than to those for
   lower courts. Most devote more time analyzing Supreme Court picks, and
   apply a higher standard for confirmation. So, for instance, there were
   Democrats who voted to confirm John Roberts to the D.C. Circuit who
   opposed his elevation to the Supreme Court, including Joe Biden and
   Dianne Feinstein. I also suspect many Democrats (and law professors,
   for that matter) who did not oppose confirming Michael McConnell to
   the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit would have opposed his
   elevation to the Supreme Court. In the latter case, writings and
   speeches that were not an issue when McConnell was nominated to be an
   appellate judge would have been an issue in the context of a Supreme
   Court nomination. This does not mean that these speeches are
   sufficient grounds for opposing Sotomayor's confirmation, just that I
   don't see why Senators who failed to raise them before should be
   estopped from raising it now.

References

   1. 
http://blogs.cqpolitics.com/legal_beat/2009/06/sotomayor-repeatedly-reference.html
   2. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/15/us/politics/15judge.text.html
   3. http://volokh.com/posts/1243569680.shtml
   4. 
http://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/senate-republicans/exclusive-sotomayor-made-same-wise-latina-comment-in-1990s-and-no-one-objected/

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to