Posted by Kenneth Anderson:
Opinionification = Commodification:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2009_06_07-2009_06_13.shtml#1244426045


   That's my take, anyway. Michael Kinsley looks at the business and
   editorial model of the new Newsweek. [1]Characteristically amusing
   piece in TNR.

   Kinsley walks through the many problems of the new, revamped Newsweek.
   How much of it looks like the old Newsweek, to start with.

   But the essence of the critique is one that bedevils these kinds of
   magazines, as well as newspapers. Gathering news that consists of
   facts that are (a) facts someone wants badly enough to be willing, in
   principle, to pay for; and (b) facts that are sufficiently current and
   new that they have not already been priced into the information and so
   discounted in pricing power is expensive. And figuring out these days
   if there any hard facts that someone is willing to pay for, even if it
   does involve people getting out of the internet echo chamber and doing
   some hard research that might involve shoe leather - that's risky and
   expensive. About the only facts that fit those categories these days
   are in the areas of business and finance and economics, where people
   have money at stake.

   So media organizations try to do two things at once.

   First, they gravitate away from the high risk fact gathering
   activities - activities that are costly on the front end, and move
   toward the cheap business of writing opinion. It involves the
   exquisitely self-indulgent belief that professional journalists are
   good writers and that people will therefore want to read them over
   blogs and stuff like that. The business model problem with this is
   that opinion is cheap to produce - but it's widely available, easily
   produced, and frankly there are a lot of people out there who, if
   someone else supplies the facts, can produce pretty decent insights
   and prose, and will do it for free, at least if their day job is ...
   lawyer. Which is to say: opinionification = commodification. And
   commodity pricing will not pay the rent in Manhattan or DC or, these
   days apparently, LA, Seattle, Denver, or a lot of other places.

   However one reads Jon Meachum's justifications for his strategy -
   Newsweek will be the Economist, it will be TNR, it will be the NYRB,
   etc. - at bottom it comes down to opinionification = commodification.

   Second, then, if you are a newspaper or newsmagazine, you understand
   the commodity pricing problem, and if you think you can get away with
   it, you depend upon your past reputation and social capital, and
   assert that your opinions are not actually opinions, but facts - and
   then you will try to price them accordingly. We lapsed Mormons call
   this "chutzpah-pricing." And the way you do this is by putting them on
   the front page. You turn the newspaper into a magazine, but you try to
   price the opinions as facts and charge the fact-premium. This is the
   basic explanation of the front page of the New York Times, as it has
   gravitated to magazine-style analysis. (And so putting it in deep
   competition with its own Sunday Magazine, something that would annoy
   the heck out of me if I were Magazine editor Gerry Marzorati.)

   But the NYT is one of a very small handful of papers that can play
   that game with a straight face; maybe the WP can, but not the LA
   Times, though it tried, and certainly not a newsmagazine. It can't try
   to premium price as facts, not when it is only appearing on a weekly
   basis anyway. Meachum appears to understand this, which is why he has
   pretty much given up on facts altogether and gone for the
   hyper-charged, hyperpuissant opinion model. He has to compete with
   newspapers as magazines, magazines as magazines, the internet as
   magazines, and without even the pretense of a budget by which to
   gather anything that can be premium priced. (I plan to put up the
   occasional post on media economics and business models. [2]Sometimes
   about the US, and sometimes about media economics in the developing
   world, where I do a lot of pro bono work.):

References

   1. 
http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=7cc5324e-0fbc-4316-a656-d49e77e3a5a4
   2. 
http://kennethandersonlawofwar.blogspot.com/2009/01/nyt-and-information-theory-of-leisure_07.html

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to