Posted by David Bernstein:
Peretz on the Cairo Speech:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2009_06_14-2009_06_20.shtml#1245077839


   Marty Peretz has won a lot of ridicule of late, primarily for a series
   of ill-thought out blog posts. But his [1]recent article on Obama's
   Cairo speech is superb. (H/T: [2]Instapundit)

   One aspect of the speech that hasn't received sufficient attention is
   the focus on victimology: Israelis were victims of the Holocaust,
   Palestinians victims of dislocation after the founding of Israel,
   Americans the victim of the 9/11 terrorists, Arabs the victims of
   Western imperialism, and so forth.

   That this appeals to Obama is not surprising. He and I attended law
   school at the same time, Obama at Harvard and me at Yale. Victimology
   was all the rage. It gave one not only moral standing, but, oddly
   enough (like Sotomayor's "wise Latina") a certain level of
   intellectual standing.

   During our first year in law school, there was a nationwide "student
   strike for diversity" at elite law schools, including Harvard and
   Yale. (I don't know for sure whether Obama was involved in this
   "strike," but he gave a speech on behalf of uber-diversity advocate,
   and Harvard lawprof, Derrick Bell.) At Yale, students gave speeches
   throughout the day. What struck me at the time was how eager, almost
   desperate, the various student speech-givers were to be perceived as
   victims.

   This included not just "people of color," but gays, Jews, Moromons,
   Catholics, and so on. Not a member of a racial, ethnic, religious, or
   sexual minority? Perhaps you were victimized by being a "First
   Generation Professional," such that you didn't know what suit to wear
   for law firm interviews, or which fork to grasp at lunch with your
   interviewers. (I wasn't quite a first-generation professional, yet I
   also didn't know these things, but I hardly wallowed in self-pity
   about it.) Or perhaps you had a learning disability. Or were from a
   less-than-ideal home. Or were less wealthy than your classmates. Or
   had to go to law school while raising a family.

   The implicit message was that we all--even white male Protestants
   attending the best law school in the country, ready to walk into six
   figure jobs upon graduation--be united in victimhood, and without such
   victimhood, our value as individuals is somehow diminished. And this
   theme cropped up repeatedly in law school.

   I've always wondered how the Ivy elite went so quickly from a bastion
   of self-confident, privileged WASP elitism to the opposite extreme of
   celebrating victimhood. Regardless, it's a unique way to run a foreign
   policy.

References

   1. 
http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=cd70b25d-12b5-4f6f-8fd3-4a965be569f3&p=1
   2. http://www.instapundit.com/

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to