Posted by David Bernstein:
No Money Down Mortgages--A Predictable Problem:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2009_07_05-2009_07_11.shtml#1246841895


   On Friday, [1]co-blogger Kenneth linked to [2]this piece in the Wall
   Street Journal explaining that the main cause of the "foreclosure
   crisis" is no-money-down mortgages. The author of the piece and
   critics disagree on whether the problem was primarily in non-subprime
   mortgages, but everyone seems to agree that 100% loan to value loans
   were a major factor in the wave of foreclosures.

   It's always easy to say something is predictable in hindsight, but I
   can say this was eminently predictable, because I predicted it (see
   below), though I linked the problem more to "nonrecourse" mortgages
   than likely was warranted, given that lenders rarely seemed inclined
   to go after debtor assets regardless. The wonder is that the geniuses
   in charge of risk management at various financial institutions, public
   and private, and the raters at the major rating agencies, didn't.
   [3]Here's what I wrote in August 2005, just when the housing bubble
   was peaking:

     Just read that 61% of all new California mortgages this year are
     interest only, no money down.... If prices drop significantly in
     the next couple of years, as they likely will (given that only 17%
     of Californians can now afford the median house), thousands of
     people are going to walk away from their loans and let the bank
     foreclose.... Sure, it will ruin their credit record, but how much
     is a good credit record worth? Probably not $120,000 (the negative
     equity on a $600K loan--median single family home price in
     California--if prices decline a modest 20%). Anyway, many of the
     loans are adjustable with "teaser" rates used to qualify the
     buyers, who understand that in two years they will have to
     refinance or sell, because they won't be able to afford the new
     payments. They are counting on interest rates being lower, or on
     being able to "flip" the house for more money, and using the
     proceeds to get "back in the game." And they are likely to lose
     their homes, and the mortgage[e]s are likely to lose a good chunk
     of the money they are lending.

References

   1. http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2009_06_28-2009_07_04.shtml#1246650505
   2. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124657539489189043.html
   3. http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2005_08_14-2005_08_20.shtml#1124513110

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to