Posted by David Bernstein:
Epstein on Bork:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2009_07_05-2009_07_11.shtml#1247247315


   In the latest issue of Regulation, Richard Epstein [1]has a scathing
   review (go to page 3) of Robert Bork's [2]latest book, a collection of
   his writings over several decades:

     what is so striking about Bork's collection of ipse dixits is that
     they never rest on the close and careful reading of text that the
     originalist method mandates. Thus, the real indictment of Bork lies
     not in the views that got him into such hot water in his 1987
     confirmation hearings. Historically, the regulation of
     contraception was subject to state regulation under the police
     power, notwithstanding Justice William O. Douglas's artful
     invocation in Griswold v. Connecticut of "penumbras" of the Bill of
     Rights. What really makes Bork a disappointing constitutional
     scholar is that his moral self-indulgence has led to an utter lack
     of intellectual discipline.

     So this review ends by pointing out this historical irony: When
     Bork was constrained by the institutional requirements of the
     judicial role, his evident intellectual and stylistic talents shone
     through. He was an excellent judge. Indeed, had history been kinder
     to him, he would have been a distinguished Supreme Court justice
     because his temper would have been held in check by the norms of
     his office. But I couldn't persuade a soul of the soundness of that
     counterfactual judgment if one took his extrajudicial writings as a
     barometer of probable judicial performance.

     Sadly, it is easy to explain why a great antitrust scholar has had
     so little influence in constitutional law. Bork may think it is
     time for him to speak out on constitutional issues. But most people
     will just tune him out, and for good reason.

   Harsh, but not unfair. I often describe Bork as "an originalist who
   seems to have little interest in history," but who instead uses
   originalist arguments to support a preconceived ideology of judicial
   restraint and social conservatism.

References

   1. http://www.cato.org/pubs/regulation/regv32n2/v32n2-8.pdf#page=3
   2. 
http://www.amazon.com/Time-Speak-Selected-Arguments-Institutions/dp/1933859687

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to