Posted by Eugene Volokh:
"Motion to Compel Defense Counsel To Wear Appropriate Shoes":
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2009_07_05-2009_07_11.shtml#1247257929


   From [1]Lowering the Bar, via [2]Cory Doctorow (boingboing):

     1. This is an action alleging personal injuries . . . .

     2. Trial is set to begin on June 15, 2009.

     3. It is well known in the legal community that Michael Robb,
     Esquire, wears shoes with holes in the soles when he is in trial.

     4. Upon reasonable belief, Plaintiff believes that Mr. Robb wears
     these shoes as a ruse to impress the jury and make them believe
     that Mr. Robb is humble and simple without sophistication. . . .

     * * *

     6. Part of this strategy is to present Mr. Robb and his client as
     modest individuals who are so frugal that Mr. Robb has to wear
     shoes with holes in the soles. Mr. Robb is known to stand at
     sidebar with one foot crossed casually beside the other so that the
     holes in his shoes are readily apparent to the jury . . . .

     7. Then, during argument and throughout the case Mr. Robb throws
     out statements like "I'm just a simple lawyer" with the obvious
     suggestion that Plaintiff's counsel and the Plaintiff are not as
     sincere and down to earth as Mr. Robb.

     8. Mr. Robb should be required to wear shoes without holes in the
     soles at trial to avoid the unfair prejudice suggested by this
     conduct.

   See also this [3]Palm Beach Post article.

References

   1. 
http://www.loweringthebar.net/2009/07/motion-to-compel-defense-counsel-to-wear-appropriate-shoes.html
   2. http://www.boingboing.net/2009/07/10/lawyer-asks-judge-to.html
   3. 
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/opinion/content/local_news/epaper/2009/06/27/a1b_bino_0628.html

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to