Posted by David Bernstein:
Human Rights Watch Goes to Saudi Arabia, UPDATE:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2009_07_12-2009_07_18.shtml#1247622550


   [1]I blogged in June about a trip a delegation from Human Rights Watch
   took to Saudi Arabia, where Sarah Leah Whitson, director of HRW's
   Middle East and North Africa division,highlighted HRW's battles with
   "pro-Israel pressure groups in the US, the European Union and the
   United Nations."

   The piece, based [2]on a story in Arab News, was reprinted [3]today in
   the Wall Street Journal's OpinionJournal.com. This, in turn, was
   spotted by the Israeli Prime Minister's Office, as detailed by [4]the
   Jerusalem Post:

     In the opening shot of a battle Jerusalem has decided to wage with
     NGOs it deems biased against Israel, the Prime Minister's Office on
     Tuesday slammed a recent Human Rights Watch (HRW) fundraising
     delegation to Saudi Arabia as evidence the organization has lost
     its "moral compass."

     "A human rights organization raising money in Saudi Arabia is like
     a women's rights group asking the Taliban for a donation," Prime
     Minister Binyamin Netanyahu's spokesman Mark Regev said Monday.

     "If you can fundraise in Saudi Arabia, why not move on to Somalia,
     Libya and North Korea?" he said. "For an organization that claims
     to offer moral direction, it appears that Human Rights Watch has
     seriously lost its moral compass."

   Ms. Whitson has responded, both in the Post and on OpinionJournal,
   asserting that contrary to the impression left by the Arab News
   (which, she notes without irony, is subject to government censorship),
   she did discuss Saudi Arabia's abysmal human rights record while on
   her trip. Perhaps Ms. Whitson will share a transcript of her remarks
   with us.

   Meanwhile, Ms. Whitson acknowledges that the trip involved
   fundraising,and she says that HRW obtaining funding from Saudi Arabia
   is something to be "applauded." She also does not deny that her pitch
   involved trumpeting HRW's battles with what Arab News quotes her as
   calling "pro-Israel pressure groups in the US, the European Union and
   the United Nations."

   For my part, if Ms. Whitson did indeed criticize Saudi human rights
   abuses during her trip, I apologize for suggesting otherwise. But I
   still think (a) it's extremely unwise for a human rights group to
   raise money in a totalitarian country, even from human rights
   advocates in that country; the organization may become dependent on
   that funding, which in turn could be cut off by the government at any
   time, creating pressure on the organization to downplay its criticisms
   of that country; (b) it's more than unwise for HRW to specifically
   raise money in Saudi Arabia by portraying itself as an organization
   doing battle with "pro-Israel forces," which implies that HRW is
   serving as an "anti-Israel force." This suggests either that HRW isn't
   concerned about its reputation for evenhandedness, or that it's so
   maniacally anti-Israel that its leaders just assume that being
   anti-Israel is somehow the obvious even-handed position that it
   embraces. This obviously plays into the hands of critics like myself
   who have previously accused HRW of a lack of objectivity with regard
   to Israel. I certainly can't imagine HRW going to Israel and raising
   money with the pitch that it is trying to counter-balance "pro-Arab"
   or "pro-Saudi" sources.

   I'll close with a quote from commenter "Patrick" at the [5]Opinion
   Juris blog (scroll down), with whom I rarely agree:

     HRW pride themselves on being independent, but this raises two
     quasi-existential threats to them. First, the poisonous allure of
     Israel-bashing does sometime threaten to contaminate and devalue
     not only their other work, but the numerous legitimate criticisms
     that might be made of Israel. Secondly, I know that it is almost
     sweetest if rich Saudis can be convinced to fund HRW, but there is
     a real risk of giving very wrong impressions by soliciting same.
     HRW appear not to have so much managed that risk as blatantly
     embraced it.

References

   1. http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2009_06_14-2009_06_20.shtml#1245159018
   2. http://www.arabnews.com/?page=1&section=0&article=122880&d=26&m=5&y=2009
   3. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124528343805525561.html
   4. 
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1246443811032&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
   5. 
http://opiniojuris.org/2009/06/16/david-bernsteins-caricature-of-human-rights-watch/

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to