Posted by Jonathan Adler:
Cornyn: A Confirmation Conversion?
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2009_07_12-2009_07_18.shtml#1247764156


   From [1]Senator Cornyn's questioning of Judge Sonia Sotomayor today:

     the purpose of these hearings is -- as you've gone through these
     tedious rounds of questioning, is to allow us to clear up any
     confusion about your record and about your judicial philosophy, yet
     so far I find there's still some confusion.

     For example, in 1996, you said the idea of a stable, quote,
     "capital L Law" was a public myth. This week, you said that
     fidelity to the law is your only concern.

     In 1996, you argued that indefiniteness in the law was a good thing
     because it allowed judges to change the law. Today you
     characterized that argument as being only that ambiguity can't
     exist and that it is Congress's job to change the law.

     In 2001, you said that innate physiological differences of judges
     would or could impact their decisions. Yesterday, you characterized
     that argument as being only that innate physiological differences
     of litigants could change decisions. In 2001, you disagreed
     explicitly with Justice O'Connor's view of whether a wise man and
     wise woman would reach the same decision. Yet, during these
     hearings, you characterized your argument as being that you agreed
     with her.

     A few weeks ago, in your speech on foreign law to the American
     Civil Liberties Union, you rejected the approach of Justices Alito
     and Thomas with regard to foreign law, and yet it seems to me,
     during these hearings, you have agreed with them.

     So, Judge, what should I tell my constituents who are watching
     these hearings and saying to themselves, "In Berkeley and other
     places around the country, she says one thing, but at these
     hearings, you are saying something which sounds contradictory, if
     not diametrically opposed, to some of the things you've said in
     speeches around the country"?

References

   1. 
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/16/AR2009071601817.html

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to