Posted by David Kopel:
Bloggers split on Palin effect, and health care taxes:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2009_07_19-2009_07_25.shtml#1248044060


   This week's [1]National Journal poll of political bloggers asked "On
   balance, would Sarah Palin be more of an asset or a liability in
   campaigning for Republicans in competitive 2010 races?" On the Right,
   62% thought she would be an asset, while only 13% of the Left did. I
   thought that she would, and wrote: "Presumably she will focus her
   efforts in races where she would be a net plus. I don't think we will
   see her campaigning for R's in Manhattan or Hollywood."
   The other question was "Name and rank the two most politically risky
   ways to amend the tax code to pay for health care reform." The choices
   were: Limit the tax break on itemized deductions, Limit the tax
   benefit for "Cadillac" employer-sponsored health plans, Limit the tax
   benefit for wealthy individuals with employer-sponsored health plans,
   Increase income taxes on the wealthy, and Tax sugary drinks.
   On the Left, the leading choices were limiting itemized deductions,
   and taxing full-featured health care plans. But the only choice that
   went over 50% (with first and second choices combined) was "none,"
   which was a write-in vote.
   On the Right, taxes on itemized deductions and sugar both got over
   50%. I thought that the sugar tax and the marginal income tax rate
   increase would be most politically dangerous. I explained: "The sugar
   tax would be well-known by even most Americans who are not politically
   engaged as an example of intrusive nannyism. It would be a net plus
   in, at most, a few very health-conscious places. It would also cause
   trouble in the farm belt. Raising taxes on the most productive people
   will not only make many of them irate, it will significantly harm the
   economy, and reduce job creation and opportunity for everyone except
   government employees."

References

   1. http://www.nationaljournal.com/njonline/no_20090716_3559.php

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to