Posted by Kenneth Anderson:
What Would Happen if We Canceled the Remainder of the Stimulus?
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2009_08_02-2009_08_08.shtml#1249322308


   I am not trying to be snarky here. This is a genuine question.
   Suppose, by assumption (as some reports have it) that a recovery is
   now getting underway - this might be true or false, take it as true by
   assumption. Unemployment, let us also take by assumption, will
   continue to rise as a lagging indicator. The recovery as currently
   projected will be weak. But a vast amount of the stimulus money has
   not yet gone out the door. I also understand that a large part of that
   has not even been committed, at least not in a firm way (I'm being
   squishy here, I realize: do I mean legally committed by contract,
   committed by legislation or earmark or something similar, what is
   'committed' or 'spent' exactly?).

   My non-snarky, technocratic policy question is - suppose we concluded
   that the recovery is actually starting, and we decided to not spend
   any more money on stimulus that was, in principle, aimed at classic
   demand-side stimulus? What would be the likely consequences?

   Would an explicit, upfront decision, for example, not to spend more
   tank the incipient (and for purposes here, assumed) recovery because,
   for example, everyone's plans were premised on this continued
   spending? Or because the recovery at this point just is stimulus
   spending and the anticipation of more of it; it is not actually the
   private economy auto-generating its own profits but instead
   effectively merely recycling government recovery funds? And the effect
   on monetary policy - deflationary pressures, for example? Other
   monetary effects, good or bad?

   Or, alternatively, would canceling the rest of the stimulus rev up the
   private economic sector, currently fearful of tax increases and
   interest rate hikes down the road and all the long term drag on
   private economic activity created by the stimulus itself? Unleash the
   'animal spirits' and all that?

   Or would the effect be something altogether different?

   Finally, what would happen if we decided to slash stimulus spending
   drastically, but still use a chunk of it in the ways that some
   proposed back when the stimulus was being debated: Fund greater and
   longer term unemployment benefits and subsidize COBRA or related
   health insurance protection for individuals and families, but not
   undertake vast new government spending on infrastructure, etc.?

   My interest here is in trying to puzzle out where alternatives might
   lead. It is not an invitation to rant or make merely political
   speeches. Please give me reasoned arguments, preferably looking to
   upsides and downsides to each of these policy alternatives.

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to