Posted by Eugene Volokh:
Prison for Posting a Rap Song Called "Kill Me a Cop":
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2009_08_02-2009_08_08.shtml#1249343839


   The [1]Lakeland (Florida) Ledger reports:

     [Antavio Johnson, 20, was charged with two counts of corruption by
     threat of a public servant after a Polk County gang detective found
     the song on a MySpace page belonging to Hood Certified
     Entertainment in February.

     In his song, "Kill Me a Cop," Johnson mentions two Lakeland police
     officers by name, according to the Sheriff's Office....

     Johnson pleaded no contest to the charges July 24 and was sentenced
     to two years in state prison....

     In the song, the lyrics "Im'ma kill me a cop one day" and "Call me
     crazy but I think I fell in love with the sound of hearing the
     dispatcher saying, 'Officer Down,'" are repeated....

     Johnson also refers to being on probation, Sheriff Grady Judd and
     the 2006 killing of deputy Matt Williams and his K-9 DioGi....

   A friend of Johnson's said he posted the song without paying close
   attention to the lyrics, and the song was never meant to be released,
   but it's not clear to me whether the prosecutors believed that.

   It's hard to tell whether the song is constitutionally protected
   without seeing the full lyrics, which I couldn't find. (Please let me
   know if you have an authoritative copy.) My tentative sense, though,
   is this:

   (1) If Johnson distributed the song (or authorized such distribution)
   with the purpose of threatening the two particular police officers,
   then it would probably fit within the "true threats" exception to the
   First Amendment protection.

   (2) If the song had simply generically said that the singer would kill
   cops one day, it would probably be constitutionally protected.

   (3) If Johnson expressly mentioned the two police officers, but did
   not have the purpose of threatening those officers -- but was just
   saying it as fiction, much as a writer might have a character say
   things that the writer doesn't intend to have taken seriously -- then
   the speech is probably protected (see [2]Virginia v. Black, Part
   III.A), though some post-Virginia-v.-Black circuit court decisions say
   that such a purpose to threaten is not required. 

References

   1. 
http://www.theledger.com/article/20090730/NEWS/907305103/1410?Title=Lakeland-Man-Goes-To-Prison-For-a-Song
   2. http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/01-1107.ZO.html

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to