Posted by David Bernstein:
Packing the Court by James MacGregor Burns:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2009_08_02-2009_08_08.shtml#1249412490


   This book, reviewed in the New York Times on Sunday, and written by an
   eminent historian, is a history and critique of the Supreme Court.
   I've read it. The only thing I learned is that there is still at least
   one historian who is stuck in a 1930s time warp, in which the history
   of the Court is a battle between evil reactionaries who oppose
   "Progressive" legislation and brave, goodhearted liberals who support
   such legislation. Every hoary Progressive/New Dealer myth about the
   Supreme Court and its Justices is trotted out.

   Consider Burns's depiction of the Justices the early 20th century.
   Holmes, Brandeis, and Harlan were the liberal heroes, everyone else
   the reactionary villains.

   Thus, Holmes was the "great dissenter" who pitted "pragmatism against
   conservative dogma." No mention of his hostility to African-American
   rights, support for eugenics, and so forth. John Marshall Harlan, who
   helped introduce the liberty of contract doctrine to the Supreme
   Court, and wrote one of the most important liberty of contract cases,
   Adair v. United States, was a "liberal." Brandeis was "an exquisitely
   tolerant, compassionate and wordly man" with a "zeal for freedom ...
   in his blood."

   The rest of the Court, however, adopted the late Justice Stephen
   Field's "laissez-faire absolutism." William Day (who dissented in
   Adair) was a "reliable ally of the court's conservative phalanx." All
   of the six Justices appointed by William Howard Taft were "stout
   conservatives." William Van Devanter was the "commander-in-chief of
   judicial reaction." George Sutherland was the leader of the Court's
   "extreme right-wing." Pierce Butler, who was perhaps the strongest
   opponent of the excesses of Prohibition enforcement and the only
   dissenter in Buck v. Bell (coerced sterilization), is reduced to a
   right-wing railroad lawyer who showed no "regard for dissidents, or
   for blacks or workers." And so o.

   No serious modern historian of the Court would recognize these cartoon
   characters. But this book, I'm afraid, is not a serious history.

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to