Posted by Eugene Volokh:
UCLA Drops Demand That Online Critic Stop Using "UCLA" in His Web Site:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2009_08_16-2009_08_22.shtml#1250874960


   The [1]Foundation for Individual Rights in Education reports:

     The University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) has withdrawn its
     unconstitutional demand that a former student take down a website
     criticizing the university. UCLA had demanded that Tom Wilde shut
     down his private, non-commercial website, ucla-weeding101.info, by
     last Monday.... [Y]esterday, only a few hours after FIRE publicized
     Wilde�s case, UCLA informed FIRE that its demands against Wilde
     were being withdrawn.

     �Kudos to UCLA for quickly realizing that the First Amendment
     protects criticism of the university -- even online,� FIRE
     President Greg Lukianoff said. �UCLA�s prompt and welcome
     recognition of the First Amendment freedoms at stake should send a
     powerful message to other California public colleges that have made
     similar threats, such as Santa Rosa Junior College, that the law
     does not support their position.�

     Wilde launched the website ucla-weeding101.info last month to argue
     that he was �weeded out� of UCLA�s Graduate School of Education for
     his dissenting views. On August 6, UCLA Senior Campus Counsel
     Patricia M. Jasper sent Wilde a letter arguing that the domain name
     constituted �trademark infringement and dilution� and suggested the
     website might be a criminal offense under the California Education
     Code. Jasper also wrote that UCLA was acting in part to protect its
     �reputation� and ordered Wilde to shut down the site by August 17.

     FIRE immediately wrote UCLA Chancellor Gene D. Block, pointing out
     that no reasonable person would mistake Wilde�s site as being an
     official UCLA site or having the college�s endorsement, and that
     the First Amendment protects the use of organization names on
     �cybergriping� sites. Further, although a disclaimer for such an
     obviously unaffiliated site is legally unnecessary, the site now
     contains a prominent statement explicitly alerting readers that the
     site is �not supported, endorsed, or authorized by UCLA or the
     University of California.�

     On August 18, Jasper notified FIRE that FIRE�s letter was under
     review and that she �anticipate[d] having a fuller response ... in
     the very near future.� Yesterday, FIRE took the case public, and
     within hours Jasper faxed FIRE to say that, while the university
     would appreciate more changes to the site, �[i]n any event, the
     University hereby withdraws the demands made upon Mr. Wilde in our
     letter to him of August 6, 2009.� ...

   My sense is that the original demand was mistaken, for reasons I've
   [2]discussed before -- the First Amendment protects people's right to
   use other entities' names (certainly including government agencies'
   names) in criticizing them.

   When the use is commercial and likely to mislead reasonable consumers,
   for instance if someone sells T-shirts with the UCLA name in a context
   which leads people to falsely believe the sale is authorized by UCLA,
   that could indeed be punished. It's possible that such commercial
   sales might even be punished if there's a disclaimer announcing that
   the seller is entirely independent of the university (though I think
   that they shouldn't be, and that people and institutions [3]shouldn't
   have a monopoly on the use of their names in merchandising, whether
   under the right of publicity for people's names or under trademark law
   for institutions and products). But when it's clear that the use is
   critical of the institution, and especially in a noncommercial
   context, there seems to me no basis for stripping the speech of
   constitutional protection.

   In any case, while UCLA started out wrong on this, I'm very happy that
   it has withdrawn its demand.

   Disclosure: I will be a [4]keynote speaker at FIRE's 10th Anniversary
   event this October. Also, as I expect most of our readers know, I
   teach at UCLA School of Law.

References

   1. http://www.thefire.org/article/10993.html
   2. http://volokh.com/posts/chain_1106249135.shtml
   3. http://www.law.ucla.edu/volokh/speechip.pdf
   4. http://www.thefire.org/index.php/article/10415.html/

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to