Posted by Jonathan Adler:
Is Poker a Game of Chance or Skill?
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2009_08_30-2009_09_05.shtml#1252093082


   Whether poker qualifies as a "game of chance" has significant legal
   implications. In can determine whether a game is legal or not, as many
   states exempt games of skill from anti-gambling rules. No surprise
   then (as the [1]Los Angeles Times reports), the definition of poker
   has become a question for the courts.

   Many games are easy to identify as either games of skill or games of
   chance, even though they combine a bit of both. Football is mostly
   about the skill of the players and coaches, but chance influences the
   games as well. There are some things that can influence the outcome of
   a game, such as the weather in an outdoor stadium, that are completely
   beyond human control. We still would not say football is a "game of
   chance," as the better team with better coaches will win more often
   than not.

   Sports are easy. More difficult are games in which chance plays a
   larger, if not wholly determinative role. Consider Backgammon. Chance
   -- the rolls of the dice -- can determine the outcome in any single
   game. Yet there is significant skill involved in playing well and,
   over time, a better player will beat a worse player more often than
   not. Other games, such as Blackjack, are clearly games of chance even
   if they involve some small amount of skill. In Blackjack, for
   instance, there is a "best" way to play that will minimize one's
   losses against the house, but the result is still up to chance. If you
   play the perfect Blackjack game (without counting cards), and the
   dealer follows house rules, whether you win or lose is completely up
   to chance (and your odds are not that good).

   So what's poker? In my opinion, playing poker at a high level requires
   an immense amount of skill, and better poker players will regularly
   outperform their less skilled competitors. Yet skill is no guarantee
   of victory in poker; the cards may still have their say. According to
   a judge quoted in the LA Times article: "A poker player may give
   himself a statistical advantage through skill or experience, but that
   player is always subject to defeat when the next card is turned."
   Nonetheless, some charged with organizing or participating in illegal
   poker games are pressing the argument that poker is not a "game of
   chance" and is not illegal under state statutes prohibiting gambling
   on such games. I wish them luck when they make this argument in court.

References

   1. 
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-poker3-2009sep03,0,1569579.story

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to