Isn’t it bizarre how most physicists will embrace that load of cosmic crap (FTL expansion) without the least bit of real evidence for it (other than a brain-dead theory) … yet … in the next breath they reject out-of-hand the dozens of successful LENR experiments, simply because those experiments are not successful 100% of the time?
From: Bob Cook Eric brings up a good point… From: Eric Walker <mailto:[email protected]> About the big bang theory -- my understanding is that it requires faster than light expansion in the earliest period. A theory that says the rules change at some point in time seems a bit ad hoc to me.
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
