Let's say 'demonstrate' instead of 'prove'.

Harry



John Steck wrote:

> I really don't care what anyone 'believes'.  This discussion group is about
> what anyone can 'prove'.  At least it used to be...  Keep going down this
> path and you might as well invite Newman back, or that idiot shill of his,
> or the Whirlpower knuckleheads, etc.
> 
> Discussions regarding scientific theory are valid if it is the premise for
> an experiment or the basis for research.  There are creative writing classes
> at the local community college that would be a better venue for that other
> tripe.
> 
> Just cut it out already.
> 
> -j
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Edmund Storms [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 1:30 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: GENERAL REQUEST
> 
> 
> Well John, I agree with you that discussions of theology can be a waste
> of time because no amount of discussion will change a viewpoint.
> Actually, such discussions are similar to those involving theory in
> science.  Nevertheless, such opinions are important to understand
> because theological beliefs are having increasing influence on science
> and on the way society is developing.  People contributing their beliefs
> on this forum are a typical cross-section of the population, hence give
> an understanding of the beliefs that are influencing policy.  Granted,
> none of these beliefs can be changed by discussion, but understanding
> them can help a person plan for and/or predict the future we all will
> experience whether we like it or not.  Self fulfilling prophecies do
> actually exist and we are seeing one develop now independent of any
> religious requirement.  As has happened repeatedly in the past, beliefs,
> religious and otherwise, guide history even though these beliefs are
> later shown to be entirely wrong.  Nevertheless, the harm has been done.
> The challenge is to personally avoid the harm these false beliefs produce.
> 
> Regards,
> Ed
> 
> John Steck wrote:
> 
>> Can we please have an immediate moratorium on all further discussions
>> related to theology here?
>> 
>> This is a SCIENCE list... You know, stuff that can be
>> proven/disproved; physics, math, research, technology, experiments, etc.
>> 
>> Respectfully.  -john
>> 
>> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to