Jed Rothwell wrote:
John Coviello wrote:

My greatest fear vis a vis cold fusion is that it will die when the researchers all die.

That's not going to happen Jed. If cold fusion is indeed a real and viable scientific discovery, the death of researchers will not end its development. Perhaps their deaths will slow cold fusion research down, but if something is real in nature it will eventually be developed by someone. The only way cold fusion will totally die is if it has been an artifact all along, gross experimental error, noise.


How do you know that? People often say things like: "Science always works in the end; valuable data is never truly lost." In other fields, valuable data and important techniques are lost all the time. I know of examples in computer programming, shipbuilding, metallurgy and many other fields. Programming techniques which were well known in the 1970s are unheard of today. I purchased a commercial program a couple years ago to accomplish one of the tasks at LENR-CANR.org. It took 10 minutes to execute. I wrote an old-fashioned Pascal program that ran in 20 seconds and did a better job.

In his latest book, Kenneth Deffeyes wrote: "the number of active exploration geologists in petroleum plus mining in the world is a few thousand, probably fewer than 10,000.

There is a population limit below which an isolated community tends to become decadent, and lose information as time goes by rather than gaining it. I don't know what the number is but 10,000 sounds 'way less than it.

There is, I believe, evidence that at least some small isolated island societies have gone extinct as a result of intellectual decadence eventually costing them the basic skills needed to survive (no references, sorry).

Textbooks can hopefully make a difference here, but as you point out they don't capture on-the-job knowledge, which can be a major part of what is known in some disciplines.


Almost all the students with a natural science and today are majoring in environmental studies or ecology. The problem involves more than just the colleges and universities. Most of us learned an enormous amount on the job from our older colleagues, skilled and experienced geologists. When those threads are broken, there is a permanent loss." "Beyond Oil," p. 179

Why should experimental science be different from these other fields?

- Jed




Reply via email to