At 12:39 pm 07/01/2006 -0500, you wrote:
>I came across this while searching for six dimensional theories:
>
>http://www.newscientist.com/channel/fundamentals/mg18925331.200.html
>
>excerpt:
>
>Claims of the possibility of "gravity reduction" or "anti-gravity" 
>induced by magnetic fields have been investigated by NASA before (New 
>Scientist, 12 January 2002, p 24). But this one, Dröscher insists, is 
>different. "Our theory is not about anti-gravity. It's about completely 
>new fields with new properties," he says. And he and Häuser have 
>suggested an experiment to prove it.
>
>This will require a huge rotating ring placed above a superconducting 
>coil to create an intense magnetic field. With a large enough current 
>in the coil, and a large enough magnetic field, Dröscher claims the 
>electromagnetic force can reduce the gravitational pull on the ring to 
>the point where it floats free. Dröscher and Häuser say that to 
>completely counter Earth's pull on a 150-tonne spacecraft a magnetic 
>field of around 25 tesla would be needed. While that's 500,000 times 
>the strength of Earth's magnetic field, pulsed magnets briefly reach 
>field strengths up to 80 tesla. And Dröscher and Häuser go further. 
>With a faster-spinning ring and an even stronger magnetic field, 
>gravitophotons would interact with conventional gravity to produce a 
>repulsive anti-gravity force, they suggest.
>
><end>
>
>There's more here; but, this is harder to understand than 
>Beta-atmosphere:


I'm very glad to hear it, Hohlraum. 8-)

As the unveiling of the Beta-atmosphere
proceeds I am confident that you will 
find it easier and easier to understand. 

If you really want to get stop press on 
the Beta-atmosphere and hear of new 
developments before they are edited and 
placed on Vortex, you should really 
become a moderator of the Beta-atmosphere 
Yahoo Group. This will allow you to read 
the files in the File and Photo section 
and download such files at maximum 
resolution so that the pages I haven't yet 
had time to OCR can be read at maximum 
resolution without straining your mince 
pies.  ;-)

Cheers,

Frank




Reply via email to