Clearly Rossi has released more than sufficient for those skilled in the art to reproduce his work(s) and the anomalous heat. You specify in your endorsement of Ahern that he has reproduced Rossi as well as others. So how is it you have seen ‘no proof’ from Rossi. Your posts are proof positive that you are engaging in semantic trolling. Such childish and/or senile grumblings about Rossi’s ‘independent’ verifiers is pure nonsense for anyone with experience in developing technologies. Rossi is following well established traditions in his work and indeed is far more revealing than virtually any pioneer technologist at this stage of the game.
From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net] Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2016 2:07 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Open Letter from Brian Ahern Wait a minute. What is the need for a secret, when there is no scientific proof of an anomaly? I have seen no proof from Rossi, have you? Let Rossi prove through an independent third party that there is a valid thermal anomaly in the E-Cat, then Ahern can be criticized for complaining about not knowing the secret of the anomaly. From: Russ George It seems Brian is revealing his curmudgeon characteristics. He is clearly frustrated and petulant that Rossi won’t give him the secrets of his e-cat master chef recipes. There are very good medications for the treatment of senile agitation these days.