Dear Frank Thank you for writing an answer to my blog editorial!
First a small correction- I started to work on LENR on March 24,1989 then working at an institute of chemistry- I have visited the neighboring institute of physics and have poarticipated at discussions re two lines of replications of the Fleischmann Pons experiment- we were hunting first of all- neutrons. Re your statement "COLD FUSION IS DEAD" this means two things: a) as you say, if Rossi E-Cat does not work, the cause is lost. But here is a big IF, are you certain it does not work and why are you certain? Because IH says it, after 3 years? b) The Rossiless part of LENR cold Fusion is also dead, so what is doing ENEA, SKINR and many others is in vain, sentenced to failure? Please explain a bit your POV's,my old friend! Very truly yours, Peter On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 6:03 AM, Frank Znidarsic <[email protected]> wrote: > Peter you and I have been working on this thing since we both took a trip > to Los Alamos Labs in 1996. With the latest failure of Rossi nothing has > come of the very long effort. Jed is not even saying so much any more. > It's over, cold fusion is dead, and its time to move on. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Gluck <[email protected]> > To: Arik El Boher <[email protected]>; Bo Hoistadt < > [email protected]>; Brian Ahern <[email protected]>; CMNS < > [email protected]>; Dagmar Kuhn <[email protected]>; David Daggett < > [email protected]>; doug marker <[email protected]>; Dr. Braun > Tibor <[email protected]>; eCatNews <[email protected]>; Gabriel > Moagar-Poladian <[email protected]>; Gary <[email protected]>; Haiko > Lietz <[email protected]>; jeff aries <[email protected]>; Mark Tsirlin < > [email protected]>; Nicolaie N. Vlad <[email protected]>; > Peter Bjorkbom <[email protected]>; Peter Mobberley < > [email protected]>; Pierre Clauzon <[email protected]>; > Roberto Germano <[email protected]>; Roy Virgilio <[email protected]>; > Steve Katinski <[email protected]>; Sunwon Park <[email protected]>; > Valerio Ciampoli <[email protected]>; vlad <[email protected]>; VORTEX < > [email protected]> > Sent: Sat, May 7, 2016 1:03 pm > Subject: [Vo]:Let's continue to think about passive vs active approach to > LENR 's existentil problems > > > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/05/may-07-2016-passive-vs-active-approach.html > > I will continue but please help me! > Peter > > -- > Dr. Peter Gluck > Cluj, Romania > http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
