Lennart Thornros <[email protected]> wrote: Jed, why so quick to judgment. >
I am not quick to judgement. I heard many months ago that the I.H. and Rossi disagreed about the calorimetry. They did not say why. I was hoping the problems (whatever they are) would be addressed by the end of the test, but I.H.'s March 10 announcement made it clear they still disagree. See: http://lenr-canr.org/wordpress/?p=1741 > All parties are in this mess. I am sure that someone will dig themselves > out of the mess. > I expect I.H. will show that Rossi is wrong. Or the two parties will settle out of court. I am amazed that IH has not found someone to get a solution. > How do you know this? Evaluation of different peoples technical capacity is one thing but it > hardly says anything about who is suppressing data or full information. > Whether I.H. is suppressing data or not, I am sure they are good at calorimetry, and I am sure Rossi is bad at it. Someone decided not to release the Penon report. I do not know whether that is Rossi, I.H., or both. > I am sure that something is wrong in those discussions between the parties. > What do you mean? How do you know this? > I am amazed every day that goes by and IH has not come out and tell either > that they have a solution or what they have done to resolve the situation. > Well, it is a lawsuit. They have to respond by a certain date -- June 10, I think. I do not know much about lawsuits, and I know nothing about this particular one. But I believe that in a lawsuit, the defendant will try to file a comprehensive rebuttal, and they don't want to talk about it beforehand. - Jed
