you do not get the significance of the electricity bills for the Rossi-IH trial? You have not seen them but they exist.
By the way I have read three discussion threads and 40 comments but could not ffind your explanation about why the IH technicians are convinced that there was absolutely NO excess heat in the 1MW experiment. Send it me in private and I will keep it secret If true the plant has consumed more energy than it produced delivered.... a financial loss and irrational to do it. peter On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > Peter Gluck <[email protected]> wrote: > > But it cannot waste the heat that is not produced.- as you believe; or not? >> > > Perhaps you misunderstand the term "waste" in this context. > > The term "waste heat" means heat that is not transferred to the fluid in a > boiler. It means heat that radiates from boiler to the surroundings. A 70% > AFUE boiler that produces 1 MW of hot water or steam would also produce 300 > kW of waste heat in the area around the boiler. In this case, in the > shipping container. > > Obviously, heat which is not produced does not exist and does not heat > anything. > > > >> If the efficiency was indeed so low, who has paid the huge electricity >> bill? >> > > I do not know what electricity bill you refer to. I have not seen any > electricity bills. > > > >> It could be as high as 85 million kWh- how much does this cost in Florida? >> > > What could be this high? I do not know what you are talking about. > > - Jed > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
