Jed, I think you take the prize. Mats has produced a report from interviewing one of the parties in the conflct. Insane and an idiot - maybe as Peter Gluck suggested you don't really mean what you say. It is a metaphor. I hope so. There are two interviews one by Mats with open references to whom and whar. Obviously there are a few statements saying that his findings are not leading to total believe of Rossi and his claims. However many things indicates thar Rossi has valid arguments. I am flabbergasted over his description about how IH wanted to cost the cooperation. I think IH cannot afford to behave so all out of professionalism, so something is not all correct. What or who I don't know. Then we have your secret report. No name, nothing substation but lots of real sure and demeaning responses. You this is built on the testing capacity of different parties. I think this is far from a measuring method dispute. Regardles, if you want your statements have any weight you need to give the whole story. No more of this anonymous dirt slinging.
I will point out I have no connection with either party, no competence in the measure mentioned technology above basic understanding of energy laws. I do not know that e=cat works. I just think we have a professional report and then we have unsubstantiated rumors that Rossi is a fraud. Well, it is not hard to say that Rossi has more substantial comments and done with dignity. IMHO IH need to step up and clear their motives. Not to me - but to the LENS community and there investors. Several accusations are so damaging for IH, that they need to clear their name. On May 16, 2016 14:24, "Jed Rothwell" <[email protected]> wrote: Quoting Mats Lewan's report: "IH never had access to the customer’s area. At the end of the test, an expert hired by IH, insisted that it was important to know where the water came from and where it was used. The ERV explained that this had no importance." This is flat out insane. This is one of the most outrageous things I have ever heard in my life. No importance?!? Any person with a half a brain would inspect the customer's equipment and confirm that it is actually using 600 kW of process heat as claimed. Rossi's other statements are also insane. I won't even go into the reason. That particular statement takes the cake. Anyone who imagined the test might be valid should understand from that statement alone that it was totally worthless. You should also now agree with me that Penon is a certified idiot for "explaining" that. - Jed
