I am in agreement with what you two are suggesting. Why should Rossi not allow the other parties to see how the heated water is used? This fact seems damning. I would not accept this condition either.
Dave -----Original Message----- From: Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> To: vortex-l <[email protected]> Sent: Tue, May 17, 2016 9:59 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Validity of E-Cat 1 MW plant test Eric Walker <[email protected]> wrote: It is a measure of Rossi's reality distortion field that people here are ok with Leonardo's and the ERV's having prevented access to IH to see the customer installation. In any other context, it would be hard to imagine that this would have taken place or to assume that the ERV was impartial. Yes. I am surprised that Rossi's supporters do not see this. I am especially surprised and disappointed in Lewan. He should have realized that not letting I.H. experts see the equipment is outrageous. It destroys Rossi and Penon's credibility. It also shows how adversarial and calculating the relationship between Leonardo and IH had become by that point, as though two people were playing chess, without a mote of real trust between them. Yes, regrettably that is the case. As I said before, I heard they had disagreements, but I sincerely hoped they would iron out the problems and agree on the test results. But it is not possible to iron out this problem! If you are not allowed to do a thorough analysis of the customer's machinery that is using the heat, it is game over. No one can evaluate a machine faced with that kind of intransigence. - Jed
