What was I thinking? Such a simplistic inversion generates physical nonsensical. Harry
Harry Veeder wrote: > > An idea... > > Suppose EM is related to gravity by an inverse isomorphism instead of a > simple isomorphism? I don't know if that is the correct mathematical > terminology, but here is what mean. First invert the EM equations by > interchanging the numerators with the denominators and then make an > isomorphism between Gravity and the inverted EM equations. > > > Harry >
