I have now realised that the equations of state for water vapour published on Dr Chaplin's properties of water website provide evidence for nested Casimir pressures.
This combined with the explanation of Beta-atmosphere pressure given in the article Aether Vacua and Cold Fusion provide a significant argument for the reality of sono-fusion ..... providing of course one can overcome the huge cognitive dissonance in recognising that materials at every scale are held together from without and not from within - a big ask, even for the members of Vortex-l. ...8-) For years I felt that only a catastrophe such as failure of a prestressed concrete AGR pressure vessel is needed to provide the necessary *Gestalt* switch. However, as AGRs are now being decommissioned this possibility is slowly disappearing. On Tue, 5 Apr 2022 at 00:37, Frank Grimer <[email protected]> wrote: > A good example of harnessing the power of the Beta-atmosphere. > They will cotton on eventually. :-) > > On Mon, 4 Apr 2022 at 22:30, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > >> This discussion group began long ago with discussions of vortex-induced >> cavitation, also known as sonofusion. Examples include the work of Roger >> Stringham and the hydrodynamics gadget (https://www.hydrodynamics.com/). >> (Look up Stringham in the LENR-CANR.org index, >> https://lenr-canr.org/wordpress/?page_id=1081) >> >> I would like to draw your attention to an ICCF23 presentation about this >> approach. The title does not indicate that's what it is about: >> >> Excess Energy from Heat-Exchange Systems >> >> Abstract: >> >> http://ikkem.com/iccf23/orppt/ICCF23-IA-21%20Huang.pdf >> >> In ICCF22, we presented a vapor compression machine (VCS-1) using a >> 2.75RT freon compressor (Figure 1) which can produce excess energy [1]. The >> hot refrigerant vapor from the compressor (around 150°C) is used to heat >> the water flowing through a tiny passage of a triple-pipe heat exchanger. >> This may cause a violent cavitation of water. The machine was modified >> furthermore and tested for two years since then. The calorimetric method >> for COP measurement was improved. The COP inside the steam generator is >> defined as the heat carried away by water (Qwnet) divided by the net heat >> input (Wt - QL), denoted as COPx . This is used as the criterion to >> determine the possibility of excess energy generation. If the measured COPx >> was greater than 1, then the cavitation-induced low-energy nuclear reaction >> (LENR) might occur. The test shows that the maximum COPx reaches 1.97 >> (Figure 1) and COPx increases with decreasing inlet water temperature. . . . >> >> Video: >> >> http://ikkem.com/iccf23/MP4/3b-IN22.mp4 >> >> In the video lecture, the COP is shown as high as 1.97 (minute 10). >> Excess heat, when present, ranges from 2.15 to 4.18 kW (minute 16:30). With >> one reactor, there were 4 months with no heat, which can be taken as a >> baseline calibration, followed by 2 months of excess heat (minute 16). >> >> An upcoming JCMNS paper has more details. >> >>
