As Lerner admits, the CMB is the main thing which is holding the big bang
theory together.
Yet the 'experts' really can't explain exactly how CMB radiation, which is
moving away from us at light-speed from a single point in time, manages to
somehow magically be reflected back so as to be observed by us as a rather
strong signal.
Maybe CMB should not be observable in 3 space at all.
IOW - it can be argued that the cosmic background is itself poorly understood
and not the best feature with which to base important derivative theories on
(like the big bang)...
H LV <[email protected]> wrote:
Eric Lerner comments on the first data from the JWST:
The Big Bang didn't happen
What do the James Webb images really show?
https://iai.tv/articles/the-big-bang-didnt-happen-auid-2215
Eric Lerner's claims are deflated in this
article:https://www.cnet.com/science/space/no-james-webb-space-telescope-images-do-not-debunk-the-big-bang/
Harry
