So we know that the electric field from the Nucleus of a Hydrogen
Nucleus can polarize the virtual particles and cause partial shielding,
this results in the Lamb shift.
This is standard model word salad. Virtual particles are just a
mathematical construct an thus never something real.
Lamb shift only happens inside a field so this is a forced interaction.
We can exactly calculate the Proton fine structure frequency (See basics
in Mills but needs some metric added..) from first principle and there
we use no virtual particles.
All non circular orbits have two extremes what explains the shift in
min/max energy.
Hence no ether or other fantasy needed.
J.W.
On 11.10.2022 11:01, Jonathan Berry wrote:
I would like to hear any counter points to these arguments.
Firstly the Aether I am talking about IS NOT NECESSARILY the
Luminiferous Aether/Ether considered disproven, though some arguments
will go in that direction also.
Hence the "Aether" in question could be Quantum fields theory, virtual
particles, cold neutrinos, dark matter, Dirac sea etc... or _anything
in or of space_ (or space-time) besides matter and light/radiation.
Therefore there isn't really any reason to discount it based on the
label Aether as it is being used as a catch all, some of which are
beyond doubt.
I would also note that the space of General Relativity is affected by
matter and light and motion can be induced in it, such as frame dragging.
And also I will be first addressing that light might potentially
affect such phenomena.
So we know that the electric field from the Nucleus of a
Hydrogen Nucleus can polarize the virtual particles and cause
partial shielding, this results in the Lamb shift.
Also displacement current through a vacuum and the very
dielectric properties of the vacuum suggest there is something
to be affected.
Many have entertained the ideas of Bearden and Scalar waves
which propose to affect space with electromagnetic fields
interfering.
Matter is 99.99999% empty space and so if matter has any
potential ability to affect anything in the vacuum likely that
would be from the 99.99999% of the volume that is just
electromagnetic flux, also if Matter plays a necessary part,
as long as the experiment is not performed in a vacuum matter
will be present even if it isn't the structured component.
Light manifests a tiny gravitational field according to
conventional theory, indeed it must due to the fact it carries
momentum and can be diverted by gravity if Newlon's laws are
to survive..
Light introduced into an otherwise massless perfectly
reflective box would, due to Doppler shift imbalancing
radiation pressure, inertial mass now be apparent.
Light has the ability to push, warm and cut matter so why
should we doubt it's influence on other phenomena?
So we should all be able to agree on two things:
There are phenomena in the background of space that certainly DO exist
that aren't matter or light. See also
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8kCtiOS_F_M&t=7s
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8kCtiOS_F_M&t=7s>
And Light (EM) could conceivably influence said phenomena.
So first a little consideration to a Lumiferious Aether. It is known
that the speed of light is C, but those who dig a little deeper
recognize that the claim is only related to the 2 way speed of light,
the round trip. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pTn6Ewhb27k
The thing is Lorentz contraction (Lorentz Aether Theory, LET) was only
conceived of as a means to make the round trip constant and it made no
pretense that it could keep the one way speed of light constant.
Well, the thing is Special Relativity has absolutely no mechanism that
can make the one way speed of light constant! It just argues that you
cannot measure the one way speed of light so live with it.
It plays a game of "if you can't easily measure the difference it
doesn't exist, but this is impossible, it is a cheat and it is a cop-out.
However, because there is no possible, no conceivable mechanism by
which the one-way speed of light can ACTUALLY be C in all directions
in all frames, then we must accept that it is in fact NOT equal in all
frames even if we have difficulty proving what it is or finding said
frame.
So as the speed of light is actually dependent on the frame you are
in, we can also put aside all the other impossibilities of Special
Relativity, we can now consider that time dilation is an absolute
thing and this is good as there are easy ways to create impossible
paradoxes.
Anyway if you want to, you can actually measure the one-way speed of
light. What you need to do is Synchronize 2 or more clocks when they
are together, now if you can establish the direction of your motion
through the prefered frame that is great as moving each clock away
from each other perpendicular to this axis motion through the prefered
frame so any time dilation is equal, if you have not established this
(and don't want to repeat the experiment in multiple different
orientations then sure the clocks will go a little out of synch but
that's not the end of the world.
Then when the clocks are apart you install them in either end of your
train laboratory, then you accelerate to a significant velocity when
both clocks read the same time.
The reason this works is because the amount of desynchronization that
occurs when the motion relative to the prefered frame is tiny only a
very tiny desynchronization occurs (if any at all), but once our
laboratory is moving at a significant percentage of the speed of light
any efforts to separate synchronized clocks leads to much greater
disparities.
But again, if the clocks are separated perpendicular to their motion
though such a prefered frame (medium) then the time dilation would be
equal and not desynchronize them in the least.
If you wanted to try and establish what the prefered frame is, you
could put some very accurate high frequency clocks around a wheel, and
to make it simply let's think of this in 2D.
As the wheel rotates a given point on it is moving directly opposite
the motion through the prefered frame and as such the time dilation is
the greatest as the motion through the frame is the greatest, and then
180 degrees around the motion would be in the same direction and as
such the velocity would be the slowest relative to the prefered frame
and as such time would move the fastest.
As such one could learn the exact axis of motion through the prefered
frame.
There are also ways to prove that time dilation must not be relative
because if it were parties on opposite sides of a rotating carousel
would agree the other is always moving relative to themselves and each
would expect the other to experience the slowest time, the fact is
that time dilation being relative breaks down completely as long as
communication is not in the direction of movement, as this removes
Doppler effects which confuses matters. Communication transverse to
the velocity creates either over moments or on opposite sides of a
rotating platform for as long as you want an unresolvable paradox.
Ok, so there must be a prefered frame because SR has no mechanism by
which the speed of light can be the same in all directions in all frames.
And for this reason and the unworkability of time dilation without a
prefered frame then we have both time dilation and length contraction
as a result of moving through a prefered frame.
This begs a question, is the prefered frame affecting matter, time,
and length but is itself unaffected by matter?!
It seems inconceivable that length, time could be affected without the
frame being affected.
And therefore we can assert that the prefered frame (The
Luminiferous Aether) is compressed by matter, but it seems undeniable
to say that it is therefore dragged and generally impressed upon by
matter.
As such it is an impressionable medium.
More-over so should anything else... PhD Comics video linked
earlier: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8kCtiOS_F_M&t=7s
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8kCtiOS_F_M&t=7s>
Of course when it comes to my own fringe efforts, there is another
hurdle or 2, the fact that the human body can detect such phenomena
though not unreasonable and not unpresidented (every culture has a
claim and practices for such an energetic phenomena), it still has to
be addressed.
And then there is possible doubt that even if you accept the existence
of something to be affected (you must), the ability of light to have
an effect (you should), and the ability of the human body to detect
such an effect (you could), why would the specific designs I have do
anything?
All I can answer is to say that many have felt it.
Maybe you will too?
https://www.reddit.com/r/Aetheric_Engineering/comments/xy8th7/stupidly_strong/
Place your palm to the screen, some will feel it, some won't. It
might take a minute, the center of the palm (somewhat tensed) to the
center of the design moving to and from the screen.
The reason the effect can project from the screen is because the
dynamics when setup in a 2D form project the influence out, this also
happens generally from a metal ring, and certainly from an extended
form like a cylinder (think cloud buster) which does project the form
out the end.
Anway, not really expecting 'converts', but I would like to know what
if anything I might have got provable wrong?
What was unclear?
Did anyone read any of this?
Jonathan, every few years I post here.
--
Jürg Wyttenbach
Bifangstr. 22
8910 Affoltern am Albis
+41 44 760 14 18
+41 79 246 36 06
