There are works to allow LLM to discuss in order to have reflection... I've seen reference to an architecture where two GPT instances talk to each other, with different roles, one as a searcher, the other as a critic... Look at this article. LLM may just be the building block of something bigger... https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2023/04/gpt4-with-reflexion-has-a-superior-coding-score.html
add to that, they can use external applications (plugin), talk to generative AI like Dall-E... Many people say it is not intelligent, but are we ? I see AI making mistakes very similar to the one I do when I'm tired, or beginner... The real difference is that today, AI are not the fruit of a Darwinian evolution, with struggle to survive, dominate, eat or be eaten, so it's less frightening than people or animals. The only serious fear I've heard is that we become so satisfied by those AIs, that we delegate our genetic evolution to them, and we lose our individualistic Darwinian struggle to survive, innovate, seduce a partner, enjoying a bee-Hive mentality, at the service of the AI system, like bee-workers and bee-queen... The promoter of that theory estimate it will take a millennium. Anyway there is nothing to stop, as if a majority decide to stop developing AI, a minority will develop them at their service, and China is ready, with great experts and great belief in the future. Only the West is afraid. (there is a paper on that circulating, where fear of AI is linked to GDP/head) Le lun. 10 avr. 2023 à 16:47, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> a écrit : > I wrote: > > >> Food is contaminated despite our best efforts to prevent that. >> Contamination is a complex process that we do not fully understand or >> control, although of course we know a lot about it. It seems to me that as >> AI becomes more capable it may become easier to understand, and more >> transparent. >> > > My unfinished thought here is that knowing more about contamination and > seeing more complexity in it has improved our ability to control it. > > > Sean True <sean.t...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think it’s fair to say no AGI until those are designed in, particularly >> the ability to actually learn from experience. >> > > Definitely! ChatGPT agrees with you! >
