Can it dream? Harry On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 11:49 AM Alain Sepeda <alain.sep...@gmail.com> wrote:
> There are works to allow LLM to discuss in order to have reflection... > I've seen reference to an architecture where two GPT instances talk to > each other, with different roles, one as a searcher, the other as a > critic... > Look at this article. > LLM may just be the building block of something bigger... > > https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2023/04/gpt4-with-reflexion-has-a-superior-coding-score.html > > add to that, they can use external applications (plugin), talk to > generative AI like Dall-E... > > Many people say it is not intelligent, but are we ? > I see AI making mistakes very similar to the one I do when I'm tired, or > beginner... > > The real difference is that today, AI are not the fruit of a Darwinian > evolution, with struggle to survive, dominate, eat or be eaten, so it's > less frightening than people or animals. > The only serious fear I've heard is that we become so satisfied by those > AIs, that we delegate our genetic evolution to them, and we lose our > individualistic Darwinian struggle to survive, innovate, seduce a partner, > enjoying a bee-Hive mentality, at the service of the AI system, like > bee-workers and bee-queen... The promoter of that theory estimate it will > take a millennium. > Anyway there is nothing to stop, as if a majority decide to stop > developing AI, a minority will develop them at their service, and China is > ready, with great experts and great belief in the future. Only the West is > afraid. (there is a paper on that circulating, where fear of AI is linked > to GDP/head) > > > Le lun. 10 avr. 2023 à 16:47, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> a > écrit : > >> I wrote: >> >> >>> Food is contaminated despite our best efforts to prevent that. >>> Contamination is a complex process that we do not fully understand or >>> control, although of course we know a lot about it. It seems to me that as >>> AI becomes more capable it may become easier to understand, and more >>> transparent. >>> >> >> My unfinished thought here is that knowing more about contamination and >> seeing more complexity in it has improved our ability to control it. >> >> >> Sean True <sean.t...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I think it’s fair to say no AGI until those are designed in, particularly >>> the ability to actually learn from experience. >>> >> >> Definitely! ChatGPT agrees with you! >> >
